The contribution of static and dynamically varying ITDs and IIDs to binaural detection.

This paper investigates the relative contribution of various interaural cues to binaural unmasking in conditions with an interaurally in-phase masker and an out-of-phase signal (MoS pi). By using a modified version of multiplied noise as the masker and a sinusoid as the signal, conditions with only interaural intensity differences (IIDs), only interaural time differences (ITDs), or combinations of the two were realized. In addition, the experimental procedure allowed the presentation of specific combinations of static and dynamically varying interaural differences. In these conditions with multiplied noise as masker, the interaural differences have a bimodal distribution with a minimum at zero IID or ITD. Additionally, by using the sinusoid as masker and the multiplied noise as signal, a unimodal distribution of the interaural differences was realized. Through this variation in the shape of the distributions, the close correspondence between the change in the interaural cross correlation and the size of the interaural differences is no longer found, in contrast to the situation for a Gaussian-noise masker [Domnitz and Colburn, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 598-601 (1976)]. When analyzing the mean thresholds across subjects, the experimental results could not be predicted from parameters of the distributions of the interaural differences (the mean, the standard deviation, or the root-mean-square value). A better description of the subjects' performance was given by the change in the interaural correlation, but this measure failed in conditions which produced a static interaural intensity difference. The data could best be described by using the energy of the difference signal as the decision variable, an approach similar to that of the equalization and cancellation model.

[1]  W. Lindemann Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W. Gaik,et al.  Combined evaluation of interaural time and intensity differences: psychoacoustic results and computer modeling. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  William A. Yost Lateral position of sinusoids presented with interaural intensive and temporal differences , 1981 .

[4]  P M Zurek,et al.  Masker-bandwidth dependence in homophasic and antiphasic tone detection. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Binaural and monaural auditory filter bandwidths and time constants in probe tone detection experiments. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E R Hafter,et al.  Masking-level differences obtained with a pulsed tonal masker. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. I. General strategy and preliminary results on interaural discrimination. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  William A. Yost,et al.  Tone-on-tone binaural masking with an antiphasic masker , 1974 .

[9]  H S Colburn,et al.  Analysis of binaural detection models for dependence on interaural target parameters. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  I. Hirsh The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .

[11]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of a Lateralization Model of Masking‐Level Differences , 1971 .

[12]  Bruce H. Deatherage,et al.  Masking and Interaural Phase. II. 167 Cycles , 1962 .

[13]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  E R Hafter,et al.  A direct comparison between lateralization and detection under conditions of antiphasic masking. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  F. Wightman Detection of binaural tones as a function of masker bandwidth. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  N. Durlach,et al.  Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Ag Armin Kohlrausch,et al.  Analytical expressions for the envelope correlation of narrow-band stimuli used in CMR and BMLD research , 1998 .

[18]  C Trahiotis,et al.  The effects of randomizing values of interaural disparities on binaural detection and on discrimination of interaural correlation. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Ag Armin Kohlrausch,et al.  Analytical expressions for the envelope correlation of certain narrow‐band stimuli , 1995 .

[20]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  MLD's and the phase angle, alpha. , 1968 .

[21]  Ag Armin Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural signal detection with phase-shifted and time-delayed noise maskers , 1998 .

[22]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of Interaural Phase and Level in Detection and Lateralization: 250 Hz , 1971 .

[23]  W. Yost,et al.  Masking of tones by tones and of noise by noise , 1974 .

[24]  S van de Par,et al.  Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  P M Zurek,et al.  Probability distributions of interaural phase and level differences in binaural detection stimuli. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  W A Yost,et al.  Tone-on-tone masking for three binaural listening conditions. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  F L Wightman,et al.  Detectability of a pulsed tone in the presence of a masker with time-varying interaural correlation. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  E. Zwicker,et al.  The four factors leading to binaural masking-level differences , 1985, Hearing Research.

[30]  S. Rice Mathematical analysis of random noise , 1944 .

[31]  W. Yost Weber’s fraction for the intensity of pure tones presented binaurally , 1972 .

[32]  Binaural mking with sine-wave maskers. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Masking of Tonal Signals , 1956 .

[34]  Richard M. Stern,et al.  Lateralization and detection of low‐frequency binaural stimuli: Effects of distribution of internal delay , 1996 .

[35]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  N. Durlach Equalization and Cancellation Theory of Binaural Masking‐Level Differences , 1963 .

[37]  F L Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Frederic L. Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differencesa) , 1978 .

[39]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  F. A. Webster,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase on Masked Thresholds I. The Role of Interaural Time‐Deviation , 1951 .

[41]  D. Perrott,et al.  Minimum auditory movement angle: binaural localization of moving sound sources. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of interaural phase and level in detection and lateralization: 250 Hz. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  E. Osman,et al.  A Correlation Model of Binaural Masking Level Differences , 1971 .

[44]  J. Culling,et al.  Measurements of the binaural temporal window using a detection task , 1998 .

[45]  B. McA. Sayers,et al.  Acoustic‐Image Lateralization Judgments with Binaural Transients , 1964 .