A Dynamic Time Warping based covariance function for Gaussian Processes signature identification

Modelling stratiform deposits requires a detailed knowledge of the stratigraphic boundaries. In Banded Iron Formation (BIF) hosted ores of the Hamersley Group in Western Australia these boundaries are often identified using marker shales. Both Gaussian Processes (GP) and Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) have been previously proposed as methods to automatically identify marker shales in natural gamma logs. However, each method has different advantages and disadvantages. We propose a DTW based covariance function for the GP that combines the flexibility of the DTW with the probabilistic framework of the GP. The three methods are tested and compared on their ability to identify two natural gamma signatures from a Marra Mamba type iron ore deposit. These tests show that while all three methods can identify boundaries, the GP with the DTW covariance function combines and balances the strengths and weaknesses of the individual methods. This method identifies more positive signatures than the GP with the standard covariance function, and has a higher accuracy for identified signatures than the DTW. The combined method can handle larger variations in the signature without requiring multiple libraries, has a probabilistic output and does not require manual cut-off selections. A DTW based covariance function is developed for Gaussian Processes.We apply this method to identify marker shales in iron ore mines.The results are compared to those using only Gaussian Processes or Dynamic Time Warping.The new function combines the flexibility of the DTW with the probabilistic framework of the GP.

[1]  Christian D. Klose Self-organizing maps for geoscientific data analysis: geological interpretation of multidimensional geophysical data , 2006 .

[2]  Bieng-Zih Hsieh,et al.  Lithology identification of aquifers from geophysical well logs and fuzzy logic analysis: Shui-Lin Area, Taiwan , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[3]  Biing-Hwang Juang,et al.  Fundamentals of speech recognition , 1993, Prentice Hall signal processing series.

[4]  M. Rider,et al.  The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs , 1986 .

[5]  Timothy R. Carr,et al.  Neural network prediction of carbonate lithofacies from well logs, Big Bow and Sand Arroyo Creek fields, Southwest Kansas , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[6]  Marra Mamba Iron Formation stratigraphy in the eastern Chichester Range, Western Australia , 2000 .

[7]  D. Lascelles The Genesis of the Hope Downs Iron Ore Deposit, Hamersley Province, Western Australia , 2006 .

[8]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[9]  Katherine L. Silversides,et al.  Fusing Gaussian Processes and Dynamic Time Warping for Improved Natural Gamma Signal Classification , 2016, Mathematical Geosciences.

[10]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Banded Iron Formation-Related Iron Ore Deposits of the Hamersley Province, Western Australia , 2008 .

[11]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Supervised classification of down-hole physical properties measurements using neural network to predict the lithology , 2016 .

[12]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  Exact indexing of dynamic time warping , 2002, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[13]  Arman Melkumyan,et al.  Automated recognition of stratigraphic marker shales from geophysical logs in iron ore deposits , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[15]  LinZsay-Shing,et al.  Lithology identification of aquifers from geophysical well logs and fuzzy logic analysis , 2005 .

[16]  Probabilistic Modeling of Ore Lens Geometry: An Alternative to Deterministic Wireframes , 2005 .

[17]  J. Asfahani,et al.  Basalt identification by interpreting nuclear and electrical well logging measurements using fuzzy technique (case study from southern Syria). , 2015, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.