Quality Assurance for OER : Current State of the Art and the TIPS Framework

We present validated quality assurance criteria as guidelines for creating and improving open educational resources (OER). We have reviewed all 45 known related frameworks in the literature, and built an open collation of 205 criteria. Through several rounds of international workshops, questionnaires, surveys and referrals, these have been examined by more than 200 OER experts and teachers around the world to produce a practical framework consisting of 38 key criteria. Through a grounded theory approach, these are distributed among four levels ; the teaching aspects, information content aspects, presentation aspects, and the system technical aspects - giving us the acronym TIPS - for a highly validated (content validity index > 0.80 according to Lawshe) framework as guidelines for determining and improving the quality of OER. These key criteria can be helpful to creators of OER, or easily applied as a rubric to assess or improve existing OER by reusers. All the methods and data are in the free-of-cost open-access domain.

[1]  Andrew E. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[2]  Erica Bell,et al.  Nursing identity and patient-centredness in scholarly health services research: a computational text analysis of PubMed abstracts 1986–2013 , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.

[3]  Ernesto Panadero,et al.  To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy , 2014 .

[4]  Leonie Ellis,et al.  Individualised marks for group work: Embedding an ePortfolio criterion in a Criterion Referenced Assessment (CRA) rubric for group-work assessment , 2012, Educ. Inf..

[5]  Stephen M. Humphry,et al.  Common Structural Design Features of Rubrics May Represent a Threat to Validity , 2014 .

[6]  H. Andrade,et al.  A review of rubric use in higher education , 2010 .

[7]  Nataliya V. Ivankova,et al.  Implementing Quality Criteria in Designing and Conducting a Sequential QUAN → QUAL Mixed Methods Study of Student Engagement With Learning Applied Research Methods Online , 2014 .

[8]  Cheryl Hawkinson Melkun Nontraditional Students Online: Composition, Collaboration, and Community , 2012 .

[9]  U. Goswami,et al.  The Future of Educational Neuroscience , 2010 .

[10]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  The Learning Intentions of Low-Qualified Employees , 2013 .

[11]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[12]  A W Tony Bates,et al.  Technology, e-learning, and distance education , 1995 .