Mechanical and failure properties of rocks with a cavity under coupled static and dynamic loads

Abstract In this study, a series of one-dimensional coupled static and dynamic loading tests were performed by using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar. Intact prismatic sandstone specimens and specimens with a prefabricated internal circular cavity were tested. The results show that, the dynamic strength of intact specimens and specimens with a cavity decreases with the increase of axial static pressure under 20–70% of the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). However, the combined dynamic-static strength of intact specimens and specimens with a cavity increases slightly with the increase of the axial static pressure. Besides, the total strain of specimens under coupled axial static and dynamic loads is approximately a fixed value (about 1.16%). Under a low axial static pressure (20–40% of UCS), dynamic load plays a major role in rock failure, resulting in tensile splitting failure in intact specimen; under a medium axial static pressure (60% of UCS), both of static and dynamic loads play a major role in rock failure, resulting in a composite tensile-shear failure in intact specimen; under a high axial static pressure (70% of UCS), static load plays a major role in rock failure where shear failure occurs in intact specimens. However, for the specimen with an internal cavity, no matter how large the axial static pressure is, X-shaped shear failure occurs under the combined axial static and dynamic loads.

[1]  Xibing Li,et al.  Dynamic Strength and Fracturing Behavior of Single-Flawed Prismatic Marble Specimens Under Impact Loading with a Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[2]  Chun’an Tang,et al.  Modeling of compression-induced splitting failure in heterogeneous brittle porous solids , 2005 .

[3]  Liang Hong,et al.  Innovative testing technique of rock subjected to coupled static and dynamic loads , 2008 .

[4]  Zilong Zhou,et al.  Mechanical properties of rock under coupled static-dynamic loads , 2009 .

[5]  Yang Zou,et al.  Dynamic Brazilian Tests of Granite Under Coupled Static and Dynamic Loads , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[6]  Zilong Zhou,et al.  Fracture analysis of marble specimens with a hole under uniaxial compression by digital image correlation , 2017 .

[7]  L. Wong,et al.  Cracking Processes in Rock-Like Material Containing a Single Flaw Under Uniaxial Compression: A Numerical Study Based on Parallel Bonded-Particle Model Approach , 2011, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[8]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Compression‐induced microcrack growth in brittle solids: Axial splitting and shear failure , 1985 .

[9]  Sheng-Qi Yang,et al.  Experimental Investigation on Strength and Failure Behavior of Pre-cracked Marble Under Conventional Triaxial Compression , 2008 .

[10]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Compression‐induced nonplanar crack extension with application to splitting, exfoliation, and rockburst , 1982 .

[11]  F.R.P. Malan,et al.  Ultra-deep mining : The increased potential for squeezing conditions , 1998 .

[12]  Xibing Li,et al.  Influence of Sample Height-to-Width Ratios on Failure Mode for Rectangular Prism Samples of Hard Rock Loaded In Uniaxial Compression , 2011 .

[13]  Erling Nordlund,et al.  The stress-strain behaviour of rock material related to fracture under compression , 1998 .

[14]  Xibing Li,et al.  Dynamic response of pre-stressed rock with a circular cavity subject to transient loading , 2017 .

[15]  D. F. Malan,et al.  Time-dependent Behaviour of Deep Level Tabular Excavations in Hard Rock , 1999 .