Landmine Detection Using Autoencoders on Multi-polarization GPR Volumetric Data

Buried landmines and unexploded remnants of war are a constant threat for the population of many countries that have been hit by wars in the past years. The huge amount of human lives lost due to this phenomenon has been a strong motivation for the research community toward the development of safe and robust techniques designed for landmine clearance. Nonetheless, being able to detect and localize buried landmines with high precision in an automatic fashion is still considered a challenging task due to the many different boundary conditions that characterize this problem (e.g., several kinds of objects to detect, different soils and meteorological conditions, etc.). In this paper, we propose a novel technique for buried object detection tailored to unexploded landmine discovery. The proposed solution exploits a specific kind of convolutional neural network (CNN) known as autoencoder to analyze volumetric data acquired with ground penetrating radar (GPR) using different polarizations. This method works in an anomaly detection framework, indeed we only train the autoencoder on GPR data acquired on landmine-free areas. The system then recognizes landmines as objects that are dissimilar to the soil used during the training step. Experiments conducted on real data show that the proposed technique requires little training and no ad-hoc data pre-processing to achieve accuracy higher than 93% on challenging datasets.

[1]  Jordan M. Malof,et al.  How do we choose the best model? The impact of cross-validation design on model evaluation for buried threat detection in ground penetrating radar , 2018, Defense + Security.

[2]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  GPR Signal Characterization for Automated Landmine and UXO Detection Based on Machine Learning Techniques , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Jürg Leckebusch Problems and Solutions with GPR Data Interpretation: Depolarization and Data Continuity , 2011 .

[4]  Georgios P. Tsoflias,et al.  Investigating multi‐polarization GPR wave transmission through thin layers: Implications for vertical fracture characterization , 2006 .

[5]  Sven Treitel,et al.  Self-organizing artificial neural nets for automatic anomaly identification , 2010 .

[6]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  The PSG, a new positioning system to execute 3D GPR surveys for utility mapping , 2003 .

[7]  Lucian Wielopolski,et al.  3D Gpr Polarization Analysis For Imaging Complex Objects , 2003 .

[8]  Vincenzo Lipari,et al.  A machine learning approach to facies classification using well logs , 2017 .

[9]  Rasaq Bello,et al.  Literature Review on Landmines and Detection Methods , 2013 .

[10]  Huanhuan Chen,et al.  An Automatic GPR B-Scan Image Interpreting Model , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Real-Time Hyperbola Recognition and Fitting in GPR Data , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Paolo Bestagini,et al.  Satellite Image Forgery Detection and Localization Using GAN and One-Class Classifier , 2018, Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics.

[13]  Federico Lombardi,et al.  Utilities detection through the sum of orthogonal polarization in 3D georadar surveys , 2015 .

[14]  Francesco Picetti,et al.  A generative-adversarial network For seismic-imaging applications , 2018, SEG technical program expanded abstracts.

[15]  Michael Unser,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Inverse Problems in Imaging: A Review , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[16]  Michael Unser,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Vertical fracture detection by exploiting the polarization properties of ground-penetrating radar signals , 2004 .

[18]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[19]  Augusto Sarti,et al.  Seismic data interpolation through convolutional autoencoder , 2018 .

[20]  Jörg Schmalzl,et al.  Using pattern recognition to automatically localize reflection hyperbolas in data from ground penetrating radar , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[21]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Two-Dimensional Reverse-Time Migration Applied to GPR With a 3-D-to-2-D Data Conversion , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Federico Lombardi,et al.  Effects of antenna orientation on 3-D ground penetrating radar surveys: an archaeological perspective , 2014 .

[23]  Jordan M. Malof,et al.  On Choosing Training and Testing Data for Supervised Algorithms in Ground-Penetrating Radar Data for Buried Threat Detection , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Herve Perroud,et al.  Influence of antenna configurations for GPR survey: information from polarization and amplitude versus offset measurements , 2003, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[25]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Multicomponent georadar data: Some important implications for data acquisition and processing , 2000 .

[26]  Federico Lombardi,et al.  Significance of GPR polarisation for improving target detection and characterisation , 2014 .

[27]  Paolo Bestagini,et al.  Landmine detection from GPR data using convolutional neural networks , 2017, 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[28]  J. Daniels,et al.  Ground penetrating radar polarization and scattering from cylinders , 2000 .

[29]  Davide Cozzolino,et al.  Single-image splicing localization through autoencoder-based anomaly detection , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS).

[30]  Augusto Sarti,et al.  Detection of linear objects in GPR data , 2004, Signal Process..

[31]  Almendra Villela,et al.  Invariant properties and rotation transformations of the GPR scattering matrix , 2013 .

[32]  Alessio Balleri,et al.  Dependence of Landmine Radar Signature on Aspect Angle , 2017 .

[33]  Jordan M. Malof,et al.  Some good practices for applying convolutional neural networks to buried threat detection in Ground Penetrating Radar , 2017, 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[34]  Federico Lombardi,et al.  Combining orthogonal polarization for elongated target detection with GPR , 2014 .

[35]  Roger Roberts,et al.  Improved Gpr Interpretation From Analysis Of Buried Target Polarization Properties , 1992 .

[36]  Francesco Picetti,et al.  Convolutional Autoencoder for Landmine Detection on GPR Scans , 2018, 2018 41st International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP).

[37]  Vikram Jayaram,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for seismic facies recognition , 2015 .

[38]  Ghassan AlRegib,et al.  Subsurface Structure Analysis Using Computational Interpretation and Learning: A Visual Signal Processing Perspective , 2018, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.