Visual angle as determinant factor for relative distance perception

Visual angles are defined as the angle between line of sight up to the mean point of a relative distance and the relative distance itself. In one experiment, we examined the functional aspect of visual angle in relative distance perception using two different layouts composed by 14 stakes, one of them with its center 23 m away from the observation point, and the other 36 m away from the observation point. Verbal reports of relative distance were grouped in 10 categories of visual angles. Results indicated visual angle as a determinant factor for perceived relative distance as observed in the absence of perceptual errors to distances with visual angle equal or larger than 70 degrees that could be attributed to a combination of sources of visual information. Another finding showed a possible intrusion of non-perceptual factors (observer’s tendencies), leading to compressed estimates to relative distances with visual angles smaller than 70 degrees. In general, research on visual perception of space is accomplished on homogeneous spaces, characterized by presentation of isolated stimuli in front of observers in order to investigate functional aspects of visual space. Homogeneous environments are not representative of real world conditions which can be better represented by visual scenes. Visual scenes are composed by a set of objects, whose locations are defined by a coordinate system which is independent of observer position. Biederman (1972) stated that one can produce two different conditions

[1]  L. Kaufman,et al.  The moon illusion. , 1962, Scientific American.

[2]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[3]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  D. Ja,et al.  Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: comparison of three psychophysical methods. , 1985 .

[7]  José Antonio Aznar-Casanova,et al.  [On the metric of visual space]. , 2006, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[8]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances , 1995 .

[9]  H. Wallach Perceiving a stable environment when one moves. , 1987, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Toward a theory of the perceived spatial layout of scenes , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[11]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[12]  I. Biederman Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.

[13]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  John W Philbeck,et al.  Visually Directed Walking to Briefly Glimpsed Targets is not Biased toward Fixation Location , 2000, Perception.

[15]  R. Toye,et al.  The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  John M Foley,et al.  Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space , 2004, Vision Research.