Engaging homeowners in building care in Hong Kong: Drivers and barriers

The painful lessons of the outbreak of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and fatal building-related accidents have alerted the community in Hong Kong of the catastrophic consequences of building neglect. To tackle the problem of building dereliction, proper building management is indispensable. However, Hong Kong's community has been slow to embrace building care culture. This article analyzes key drivers and barriers to engaging Hong Kong homeowners with voluntary building care initiatives. Generally speaking, the surveyed homeowners were sensitive to the economic costs and benefits of their participation in building care. Besides, homeowners’ approach towards building management and maintenance is predominantly reactive, and legislation remains the key drive for engaging them with the building problems. Operational difficulties in building management and lack of confidence in repair and maintenance personnel contribute significantly to the comparatively poor development of building care culture in Hong Kong. As long as most homeowners regard voluntary building management and maintenance as time- and money-consuming ‘extras’, fundamental improvements in the urban built environment, particularly the existing buildings, will be difficult to achieve.

[1]  Lawrence W.C. Lai,et al.  The formation of owners’ corporations in Hong Kong’s private housing estates: A probit evaluation of Mancur Olson’s group theory , 2004 .

[2]  Nick Bailey,et al.  Management of flats in multiple ownership: Learning from other countries , 1997 .

[3]  G. Raw,et al.  Building Regulation and Health , 1995 .

[4]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Home injuries and built form – methodological issues and developments in database linkage , 2005, BMC health services research.

[5]  C. Webster,et al.  Homeowners Associations, Collective Action and the Costs of Private Governance , 2005 .

[6]  J. Oosterhaven,et al.  Annual Report 2008 , 2009 .

[7]  Steven C. Bourassa,et al.  Hedonic Prices and House Numbers: The Influence of Feng Shui , 1999 .

[8]  John F. Kain,et al.  Measuring the Value of Housing Quality , 1970 .

[9]  Yung Yau,et al.  Determinants of the Safety Performance of Private Multi-storey Residential Buildings in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[10]  Siu Kei Wong,et al.  Governance in a co‐ownership environment: The management of multiple‐ownership property in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[11]  Yung Yau Building conditions in Yau Tsim Mong, Hong Kong: Appraisal, exploration and estimation , 2008 .

[12]  C. W. Tam,et al.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers , 2004, Psychological Medicine.

[13]  Dcw Ho,et al.  Improving the living environment in Hong Kong through the use of a building classification system , 2004 .

[14]  N. Kohler,et al.  The building stock as a research object , 2002 .

[15]  P Howden-Chapman,et al.  Housing standards: a glossary of housing and health , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[16]  Kw Chau,et al.  Are our residential buildings healthy and safe? A survey in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[17]  M. Braubach,et al.  A pan-European housing and health survey: description and evaluation of methods and approaches , 2007 .

[18]  Joseph Kangwa,et al.  An investigation into home owner maintenance awareness, management and skill‐knowledge enhancing attributes , 2003 .

[19]  J. Dunn Housing and Health Inequalities: Review and Prospects for Research , 2000 .

[20]  A. Leung,et al.  Estimating the value enhancement effects of refurbishment , 2003 .

[21]  Wei Yang,et al.  Long-term management of building stocks , 2007 .