Getting lucky with adaptive optics: diffraction-limited resolution in the visible with current AO systems on large and small telescopes

We have recently demonstrated diffraction-limited resolution imaging in the visible on the 5m Palomar Hale telescope. The new LAMP instrument is a Lucky Imaging backend camera for the Palomar AO system. Typical resolutions of 35-40 mas with Strehls of 10-20% were achieved at 700nm, and at 500nm the FWHM resolution was as small as 42 milliarcseconds. In this paper we discuss the capabilities and design challenges of such a system used with current and near future AO systems on a variety of telescopes. In particular, we describe the designs of two planned Lucky Imaging + AO instruments: a facility instrument for the Palomar 200" AO system and its PALM3K upgrade, and a visible-light imager for the CAMERA low-cost LGS AO system planned for the Palomar 60" telescope. We introduce a Monte Carlo simulation setup that reproduces the observed PSF variability behind an adaptive optics system, and apply it to predict the performance of 888Cam and CAMERA. CAMERA is predicted to achieve diffraction-limited resolution at wavelengths as short as 350 nm. In addition to on-axis resolution improvements we discuss the results of frame selection with the aim of improving other image parameters such as isoplanatic patch sizes, showing that useful improvements in image quality can be made by Lucky+AO even with very temporally and spatially undersampled data.

[1]  Derrick Salmon,et al.  MIRROR, DOME, AND NATURAL SEEING AT CFHT , 1991 .

[2]  Cambridge,et al.  Lucky imaging: High angular resolution imaging in the visible from the ground , 2005, astro-ph/0507299.

[3]  Craig D. Mackay,et al.  High-resolution imaging in the visible from the ground without adaptive optics: new techniques and results , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[4]  Bernhard R. Brandl,et al.  First tip-tilt correction with the Palomar 200-in. adaptive optics system , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[5]  S. Gladysz,et al.  Temporal Variability and Statistics of the Strehl Ratio in Adaptive-Optics Images , 2008, 0801.4889.

[6]  Nicholas M. Law,et al.  Lucky imaging: diffraction-limited astronomy from the ground in the visible , 2007 .

[7]  Norbert Hubin,et al.  Using single-mode fibers to monitor fast Strehl ratio fluctuations - Application to a 3.6 m telescope corrected by adaptive optics , 2000 .

[8]  Craig D. Mackay,et al.  Astronomical imaging with L3CCDs: detector performance and high-speed controller design , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[9]  Craig D. Mackay,et al.  The point spread function in Lucky Imaging and variations in seeing on short timescales , 2008 .

[10]  J. G. Robertson,et al.  GETTING LUCKY WITH ADAPTIVE OPTICS: FAST ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGE SELECTION IN THE VISIBLE WITH A LARGE TELESCOPE , 2008, 0805.1921.

[11]  A. S. Fruchter,et al.  Drizzle: A Method for the Linear Reconstruction of Undersampled Images , 1998 .

[12]  Eric E. Bloemhof,et al.  Palomar adaptive optics project: status and performance , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.