Competition is a driving force in topographic mapping

Topographic maps are the primary means of relaying spatial information in the brain. Understanding the mechanisms by which they form has been a goal of experimental and theoretical neuroscientists for decades. The projection of the retina to the superior colliculus (SC)/tectum has been an important model used to show that graded molecular cues and patterned retinal activity are required for topographic map formation. Additionally, interaxon competition has been suggested to play a role in topographic map formation; however, this view has been recently challenged. Here we present experimental and computational evidence demonstrating that interaxon competition for target space is necessary to establish topography. To test this hypothesis experimentally, we determined the nature of the retinocollicular projection in Math5 (Atoh7) mutant mice, which have severely reduced numbers of retinal ganglion cell inputs into the SC. We find that in these mice, retinal axons project to the anteromedialj portion of the SC where repulsion from ephrin-A ligands is minimized and where their attraction to the midline is maximized. This observation is consistent with the chemoaffinity model that relies on axon–axon competition as a mapping mechanism. We conclude that chemical labels plus neural activity cannot alone specify the retinocollicular projection; instead axon–axon competition is necessary to create a map. Finally, we present a mathematical model for topographic mapping that incorporates molecular labels, neural activity, and axon competition.

[1]  Alexei A Koulakov,et al.  A stochastic model for retinocollicular map development , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[2]  Michael P Stryker,et al.  Roles of Ephrin-As and Structured Activity in the Development of Functional Maps in the Superior Colliculus , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Yoon Reorganization of retinotectal projection following surgical operations on the optic tectum in goldfish. , 1971, Experimental neurology.

[4]  Hisao Honda,et al.  Competition between Retinal Ganglion Axons for Targets under the Servomechanism Model Explains Abnormal Retinocollicular Projection of Eph Receptor-Overexpressing or Ephrin-Lacking Mice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Rakic,et al.  Development of visual centers in the primate brain depends on binocular competition before birth. , 1981, Science.

[6]  D. Feldheim,et al.  Making a visual map: mechanisms and molecules , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Ian D. Thompson,et al.  Opposing Gradients of Ephrin-As and EphA7 in the Superior Colliculus Are Essential for Topographic Mapping in the Mammalian Visual System , 2005, Neuron.

[8]  M. Stryker,et al.  Ephrin-As Guide the Formation of Functional Maps in the Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[9]  T. Glaser,et al.  Math5 is required for retinal ganglion cell and optic nerve formation. , 2001, Development.

[10]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Mechanisms of retinotopic map development: Ephs, ephrins, and spontaneous correlated retinal activity. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[11]  P. Tucker,et al.  Math5 encodes a murine basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor expressed during early stages of retinal neurogenesis. , 1998, Development.

[12]  D. O'Leary,et al.  p75NTR Mediates Ephrin-A Reverse Signaling Required for Axon Repulsion and Mapping , 2008, Neuron.

[13]  D H Perkel,et al.  Competitive and positional cues in the patterning of nerve connections. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[14]  D. O'Leary,et al.  EphB Forward Signaling Controls Directional Branch Extension and Arborization Required for Dorsal-Ventral Retinotopic Mapping , 2002, Neuron.

[15]  Jeff W. Lichtman,et al.  Activity-Driven Synapse Elimination Leads Paradoxically to Domination by Inactive Neurons , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Retinotopic Map Refinement Requires Spontaneous Retinal Waves during a Brief Critical Period of Development , 2003, Neuron.

[17]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographic Guidance Labels in a Sensory Projection to the Forebrain , 1998, Neuron.

[18]  Michael C Crair,et al.  Evidence for an Instructive Role of Retinal Activity in Retinotopic Map Refinement in the Superior Colliculus of the Mouse , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographically Specific Effects of ELF-1 on Retinal Axon Guidance In Vitro and Retinal Axon Mapping In Vivo , 1996, Cell.

[20]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Bifunctional action of ephrin-B1 as a repellent and attractant to control bidirectional branch extension in dorsal-ventral retinotopic mapping , 2003, Development.

[21]  D. Willshaw,et al.  On a role for competition in the formation of patterned neural connexions , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[22]  C. Shatz,et al.  Transient period of correlated bursting activity during development of the mammalian retina , 1993, Neuron.

[23]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Retinal Axon Response to Ephrin-As Shows a Graded, Concentration-Dependent Transition from Growth Promotion to Inhibition , 2004, Neuron.

[24]  Dmitry Tsigankov,et al.  Optimal Axonal and Dendritic Branching Strategies During the Development of Neural Circuitry , 2008, Front. Neural Circuits.

[25]  D. Baylor,et al.  Synchronous bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells of the developing mammalian retina. , 1991, Science.

[26]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Loss-of-Function Analysis of EphA Receptors in Retinotectal Mapping , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Herwig Baier,et al.  Retinotopic order in the absence of axon competition , 2008, Nature.

[28]  B. Lewin On neuronal specificity and the molecular basis of perception , 1994, Cell.

[29]  G. Schneider,et al.  Orderly compression of the retinotectal projection following partial tectal ablation in the newborn hamster , 1979, Nature.

[30]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Neural map specification by gradients , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  A. Schmitt,et al.  Wnt–Ryk signalling mediates medial–lateral retinotectal topographic mapping , 2006, Nature.

[32]  Alexei A. Koulakov,et al.  A unifying model for activity-dependent and activity-independent mechanisms predicts complete structure of topographic maps in ephrin-A deficient mice , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[33]  L. Chalupa,et al.  Retinal waves in mice lacking the β2 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Topographic Mapping from the Retina to the Midbrain Is Controlled by Relative but Not Absolute Levels of EphA Receptor Signaling , 2000, Cell.

[35]  J E Cook Interactions between optic fibres controlling the locations of their terminals in the goldfish optic tectum. , 1979, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[36]  J. Nathans,et al.  Distinct Roles of Transcription Factors Brn3a and Brn3b in Controlling the Development, Morphology, and Function of Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2009, Neuron.

[37]  Alexander Sher,et al.  Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Retinal Waves Underlying Activity-Dependent Refinement of Retinofugal Projections , 2009, Neuron.

[38]  Franco Weth,et al.  Modulation of EphA Receptor Function by Coexpressed EphrinA Ligands on Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons , 1999, Neuron.

[39]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Ephrin-As and neural activity are required for eye-specific patterning during retinogeniculate mapping , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Eph/ephrin A- and B-family expression patterns in the leopard frog (Rana utricularia). , 2005, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[41]  R. Sperry,et al.  Preferential selection of central pathways by regenerating optic fibers. , 1963, Experimental neurology.

[42]  H Honda,et al.  Topographic mapping in the retinotectal projection by means of complementary ligand and receptor gradients: a computer simulation study. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF‐1 in guiding retinal axons , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[44]  R. Hunt,et al.  Retinotectal specificity: models and experiments in search of a mapping function. , 1980, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  S. Easter,et al.  Expansion of the half retinal projection to the tectum in goldfish: An electrophysiological and Anatomical study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[46]  A Gierer,et al.  Model for the retino-tectal projection , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[47]  W. Wurst,et al.  A role for the EphA family in the topographic targeting of vomeronasal axons. , 2001, Development.

[48]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Development of topographic order in the mammalian retinocollicular projection , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[49]  Dmitry Tsigankov,et al.  Sperry versus Hebb: Topographic mapping in Isl2/EphA3 mutant mice , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[50]  D. Butts Retinal Waves: Implications for Synaptic Learning Rules during Development , 2002, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[51]  David A Feldheim,et al.  Ephrin-As and Patterned Retinal Activity Act Together in the Development of Topographic Maps in the Primary Visual System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA-ephrinA gradients, axon-axon interactions, and patterned activity. , 2004, Journal of neurobiology.

[53]  M. Romeskie,et al.  Immediate ‘compression’ of the goldfish retinal projection to a tectum devoid of degenerating debris , 1977, Brain Research.

[54]  R. Hindges,et al.  A TrkB/EphrinA Interaction Controls Retinal Axon Branching and Synaptogenesis , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Graded and lamina-specific distributions of ligands of EphB receptor tyrosine kinases in the developing retinotectal system. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[56]  Bin Lin,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cell Type, Size, and Spacing Can Be Specified Independent of Homotypic Dendritic Contacts , 2004, Neuron.