Estimating the Robust P-Q Capability of a Technical Virtual Power Plant Under Uncertainties

The technical virtual power plant (TVPP) is a promising paradigm to facilitate the integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) while incorporating operational constraints of both DERs and networks. Due to the volatility and limited predictability of DER generation and electric loads, the output capability of the TVPP is uncertain. In this regard, this paper proposes the robust capability curve (RCC) of the TVPP, which explicitly characterizes the allowable range of the scheduled power output that is executable for the TVPP under uncertainties. Implementing the RCC can secure the scheduling of the TVPP against unexpected fluctuations of operating conditions when the TVPP participates in the transmission-level dispatch. Mathematically, the RCC is the first-stage feasible set of an adjustable robust optimization problem. An uncertainty set model incorporating the variable correlation and uncertainty budget is employed, which makes the robustness and conservatism of the RCC adjustable. A novel methodology is proposed to estimate the RCC by the convex hull of several points on its perimeter. These perimeter points are obtained by solving a series of multi scenario-optimal power flow problems with worst-case uncertainty realizations identified based on a linearized network configuration. Case studies based on the IEEE-13 test feeder validate the effectiveness of the RCC to ensure the scheduling feasibility while hedging against uncertainties. The computational efficiency of the proposed RCC estimation method is also verified based on larger-scale test systems.

[1]  Michael J. Dolan,et al.  Reducing Distributed Generator Curtailment Through Active Power Flow Management , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Robust Estimation of Reactive Power for an Active Distribution System , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  A. P. Sakis Meliopoulos,et al.  Aggregate modeling of distribution systems for multi-period OPF , 2016, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[4]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  A Linearized OPF Model With Reactive Power and Voltage Magnitude: A Pathway to Improve the MW-Only DC OPF , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  F.C. Huff,et al.  Optimal load dispatch based on generator reactive capability curve , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[6]  L. A. F. M. Ferreira,et al.  Distributed Energy Resources Integration Challenges in Low-Voltage Networks: Voltage Control Limitations and Risk of Cascading , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[7]  Federico Silvestro,et al.  Participation of Customers to Virtual Power Plants for Reactive Power Provision , 2018, 2018 53rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC).

[8]  T. E. McDermott,et al.  Analytic Considerations and Design Basis for the IEEE Distribution Test Feeders , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  R.J. Thomas,et al.  On Computational Issues of Market-Based Optimal Power Flow , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Zhao Xu,et al.  Direct Interval Forecasting of Wind Power , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Multistage Robust Unit Commitment With Dynamic Uncertainty Sets and Energy Storage , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Nouredine Hadjsaid,et al.  On the concept and the interest of virtual power plant: Some results from the European project Fenix , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  Zofia Lukszo,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Responsive Demand. Do We Need Congestion Management in the Distribution Grid? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Lisa Tang,et al.  Examination of Three Different ACOPF Formulations With Generator Capability Curves , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  The challenges of estimating the impact of distributed energy resources flexibility on the TSO/DSO boundary node operating points , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources , 2007 .

[17]  Long Zhao,et al.  Solving two-stage robust optimization problems using a column-and-constraint generation method , 2013, Oper. Res. Lett..

[18]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  Estimating the Active and Reactive Power Flexibility Area at the TSO-DSO Interface , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Mahraz Amini,et al.  Trading Off Robustness and Performance in Receding Horizon Control with Uncertain Energy Resources , 2018, 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[20]  Dong Yue,et al.  Economic dispatch of power systems with virtual power plant based interval optimization method , 2016 .

[21]  Marcos J. Rider,et al.  Optimal Operation of Distribution Networks Considering Energy Storage Devices , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[22]  John Lygeros,et al.  Aggregation and Disaggregation of Energetic Flexibility From Distributed Energy Resources , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[23]  Bowen Li,et al.  Chance Constrained Reserve Scheduling Using Uncertain Controllable Loads Part I: Formulation and Scenario-Based Analysis , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[24]  S. Perera,et al.  Capability chart: A new tool for grid-tied microgrid operation , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition.

[25]  Alejandro Garces,et al.  A Linear Three-Phase Load Flow for Power Distribution Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Enforcing Intra-Regional Constraints in Tie-Line Scheduling: A Projection-Based Framework , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Yajuan Liu,et al.  Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures , 2019, Applied Energy.

[28]  T. Thiringer,et al.  Wind Farms as Reactive Power Ancillary Service Providers—Technical and Economic Issues , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[29]  A. Ben-Tal,et al.  Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs , 2004, Math. Program..

[30]  Hongming Yang,et al.  Distributed Optimal Dispatch of Virtual Power Plant via Limited Communication , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  Anastasios G. Bakirtzis,et al.  Optimal Offering Strategy of a Virtual Power Plant: A Stochastic Bi-Level Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[32]  Qian Ai,et al.  Optimal scheduling strategy for virtual power plants based on credibility theory , 2016 .

[33]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[34]  Hiroshi Konno,et al.  A cutting plane algorithm for solving bilinear programs , 1976, Math. Program..

[35]  Paul Smith,et al.  Capability Chart for Distributed Reactive Power Resources , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[36]  Luis Baringo,et al.  Day-Ahead Self-Scheduling of a Virtual Power Plant in Energy and Reserve Electricity Markets Under Uncertainty , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[37]  R. J. Bessa,et al.  Estimation of the flexibility range in the transmission-distribution boundary , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[38]  Hoay Beng Gooi,et al.  Polyhedral Predictive Regions for Power System Applications , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[39]  Leonardo Meeus,et al.  DSO-TSO cooperation issues and solutions for distribution grid congestion management , 2018, Energy Policy.

[40]  Florin Capitanescu,et al.  TSO–DSO interaction: Active distribution network power chart for TSO ancillary services provision , 2018, Electric Power Systems Research.