Terminal guidance strategy for a hybrid thrust-tether lunar landing scheme

Abstract A hybrid thrust-tether lunar landing scheme and its terminal guidance strategy are proposed in this paper, which has potential application in avoiding the dusts aroused by the plume of thrusters. The combined lander is made up of a descent stage and a rover, which are connected by a tethered device. An innovative combination of fuzzy and variable-structure controllers is introduced to guide the terminal landing, which is more robust than some classical guidance laws derived from the linearized dynamics. At the beginning of this phase, the combined lander carries out the targeting guidance law from the height of 250 m to the desired landing site. When the combined lander arrives at the height of about 20 m, the tethered device is triggered to release the rover which is controlled by the tensioning force provided by the motor and windlass. In releasing the rover, the descent stage is required to hover above the lunar surface at a certain height until the rover meets safe landing conditions. After the rover cuts off the tether, the descent stage will be driven by the deputy thrusters as far away from the rover as possible. A typical scenario is implemented numerically to demonstrate the stabilization of the horizontal initial velocity even in nonzero azimuth angle case. To investigate the robustness of the closed-loop guidance law, a Monte-Carlo simulation is performed to create all the scenarios parameterized by the errors in initial position and velocity which is the result of last powered descent phase.

[1]  Dayi Wang,et al.  Autonomous navigation and guidance for pinpoint lunar soft landing , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[2]  H. B. Chenoweth Monte Carlo simulation of the Apollo Command Module land landing , 1971 .

[3]  Jian Guo,et al.  Design of guidance laws for lunar pinpoint soft landing , 2009 .

[4]  Dilmurat Azimov Enhanced Apollo-Class Real-Time Targeting and Guidance for Powered Descent and Precision Landing , 2013 .

[5]  M. Mantus,et al.  Landing dynamics of the lunar excursion module. , 1966 .

[6]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  A computational algorithm for functional inequality constrained optimization problems , 1990, Autom..

[7]  Maodeng Li,et al.  Adaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy , 2011 .

[8]  Raymond S. Baker,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Descent-Stage Integrated Propulsion Subsystem: Development and Flight Performance , 2014 .

[9]  Nicolás Weiss,et al.  Constant-Optic-Flow Lunar Landing: Optimality and Guidance , 2011 .

[10]  R. Ramanan,et al.  Analysis of optimal strategies for soft landing on the Moon from lunar parking orbits , 2005 .

[11]  F Zhang,et al.  Fuel near-optimal guidance law for the powered descending phase of a lunar module , 2012 .

[12]  Ronald R. Sostaric,et al.  Powered Descent Guidance Methods For The Moon and Mars , 2005 .

[13]  Wen-June Wang,et al.  Stabilizability of linear quadratic state feedback for uncertain fuzzy time-delay systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[14]  Phil Palmer,et al.  Engineering Notes Dynamic Systems Approach to the Lander Descent Problem , 2011 .

[15]  Guang-Ren Duan,et al.  Integrated translational and rotational control for the terminal landing phase of a lunar module , 2013 .

[16]  Allen Chen,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Entry, Descent, and Landing System Development Challenges , 2014 .

[17]  W. F. Rogers Apollo experience report: Lunar module landing gear subsystem , 1972 .

[18]  Allan Y. Lee Fuel-Efficient Descent and Landing Guidance Logic for a Safe Lunar Touchdown , 2011 .

[19]  Mohamed Benrejeb,et al.  Order reduction of complex systems described by TSK fuzzy models based on singular perturbations method , 2013, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[20]  Joseph E. Riedel,et al.  Preliminary Design of the Guidance, Navigation, and Control System of the Altair Lunar Lander , 2010 .

[21]  Behçet Açikmese,et al.  Lossless Convexification of Nonconvex Control Bound and Pointing Constraints of the Soft Landing Optimal Control Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[22]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  Optimal Guidance for Lunar Module Soft Landing , 2009 .

[23]  E.C. Wong,et al.  Guidance and Control Design for Powered Descent and Landing on Mars , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[24]  Xiangyu Huang,et al.  GNC system scheme for lunar soft landing spacecraft , 2008 .

[25]  Zhu Jianfeng,et al.  A new strategy for lunar soft landing , 2007 .

[26]  Jeffrey J. Biesiadecki,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Flyaway Guidance, Navigation, and Control System Design , 2014 .