Field Dependency and the Sense of Object-Presence in Haptic Virtual Environments

Virtual environment (VE) users often report having a sense of being present in the virtual place or a sense that the virtual object is present in their environment. This sense of presence depends on both the technological fidelity (e.g., in graphics, haptics) and the users' cognitive/ personality characteristics. This study examined the correlation between user's cognitive style on the field-dependency dimension and the level of object-presence they reported in a haptic VE. Results indicated that field-independent individuals reported higher presence ratings compared to field-dependent participants. We hypothesize that field-independents' advantage in reorganizing the perceptual field and constructing it according to their previously acquired internal knowledge enables them to cognitively reconstruct the VE experience more efficiently by selectively attending only to the relevant cues and by filling in the gap of missing information with their previous knowledge and creative imagination. This active and creative cognitive process may be behind the enhanced sense of presence. In addition, we raise a possible linkage between field dependency, the sense of presence, and simulator sickness phenomenon.

[1]  R. Elliott.  Interrelationships among measures of field dependence, ability, and personality traits. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[2]  C. L. Thornton,et al.  Cue conflict related to perceptual style. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[4]  P. Wachtel,et al.  Hypnotizability and cognitive controls. , 1973, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[5]  G. V. Barrett,et al.  Relationship between perceptual style and responses to visual motion under active and passive viewing conditions. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  H. Eysenck.  Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Herman A. Witkin and Donald R. Goodenough International Universities Press, New York (1981). 141 pp. , 1982 .

[7]  L. D. Noppe.  The Relationship of Formal Thought and Cognitive Styles to Creativity , 1985 .

[8]  Janet G. Melancon,et al.  Measurement Characteristics of the Finding Embedded Figures Test with Middle School Students. , 1989 .

[9]  S. Wapner,et al.  Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span. , 1991 .

[10]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Ecological systems theory. , 1992 .

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  Representations Systems, Perceptual Position, and Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Mel Slater,et al.  Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  M. Blagrove,et al.  Interrogative suggestibility: The effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field dependence , 1994 .

[14]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Dynamic Shadows on Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 1995, Virtual Environments.

[15]  H. Triandis.  Individualism And Collectivism , 1995 .

[16]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[17]  Concepción Perpiñá,et al.  Psychological Variables and Reality Judgment in Virtual Environments: The Roles of Absorption and Dissociation , 1999, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? , 1999, Psychological review.

[19]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[20]  G. Gudjonsson.  The psychology of interrogations, confessions, and testimony , 1999 .

[21]  Brett Stevens,et al.  The Sense of Object-Presence with Projection-Augmented Models , 2000, Haptic Human-Computer Interaction.

[22]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Gunnar Jansson,et al.  The potential importance of prceptual filling-in for haptic perception of virtual object form , 2001 .

[24]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Visual Touch in Virtual Environments: An Exploratory Study of Presence, Multimodal Interfaces, and Cross-Modal Sensory Illusions , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[25]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Extreme Responses to Virtual Environment Exposure , 2001 .

[26]  Mark H. Draper,et al.  Effects of Image Scale and System Time Delay on Simulator Sickness within Head-Coupled Virtual Environments , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[27]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Michael Meehan,et al.  Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments , 2002, SIGGRAPH.

[29]  J. T. Ogle.  The Effects of Virtual Environments on Recall in Participants of Differing Levels of Field Dependence , 2002 .

[30]  A. Bronstein.  Under-rated neuro-otological symptoms: Hoffman and Brookler 1978 revisited. , 2002, British medical bulletin.

[31]  David Callear,et al.  Putting the Virtual into Reality: Assessing Object-Presence with Projection-Augmented Models , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[32]  A. Rizzo,et al.  A 3D Virtual Environment Rod and Frame Test: The Reliability and Validity of Four Traditional Scoring Methods for Older Adults , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[33]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Presence Equation: An Investigation into Cognitive Factors Underlying Presence , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[34]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Presence and task performance: an approach in the light of cognitive style , 2003, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[35]  Andreas Hergovich.  Field dependence, suggestibility and belief in paranormal phenomena , 2003 .

[36]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures , 2003, Psychological science.

[37]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  “Conflicting” Motion Cues to the Visual and Vestibular Self- Motion Systems Around 0.06 Hz Evoke Simulator Sickness , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[38]  Corina Sas,et al.  Individual Differences in Virtual Environments , 2004, International Conference on Computational Science.

[39]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  The role of haptics in immersive telecommunication environments , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[40]  Mel Slater,et al.  How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[41]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Ivan Alsina Jurnet,et al.  Individual Differences in the Sense of Presence , 2005 .

[43]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.10 October 2005 The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception , 2022 .

[44]  N. Ravaja,et al.  The Impact of Personality Factors on the Experience of Spatial Presence , 2005 .

[45]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Point of View , 2007 .

[46]  W. Bles,et al.  Presence in virtual environments. , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.