Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages.

Recent research has suggested that when people resist persuasion they can perceive this resistance and, under specifiable conditions, become more certain of their initial attitudes (e.g., Z. L. Tormala & R. E. Petty, 2002). Within the same metacognitive framework, the present research provides evidence for the opposite phenomenon--that is, when people resist persuasion, they sometimes become less certain of their initial attitudes. Four experiments demonstrate that when people perceive that they have done a poor job resisting persuasion (e.g., they believe they generated weak arguments against a persuasive message), they lose attitude certainty, show reduced attitude-behavioral intention correspondence, and become more vulnerable to subsequent persuasive attacks. These findings suggest that resisted persuasive attacks can sometimes have a hidden yet important success by reducing the strength of the target attitude.

[1]  J. N. Bassili.  Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. , 1996 .

[2]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Experimental Induction of Biased Systematic Processing: The Directed-Thought Technique , 1998 .

[3]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  Perspectivism in Social Psychology: The Yin and Yang of Scientific Progress , 2004 .

[4]  Kimberly A. Cameron,et al.  Strategies for Resisting Persuasion , 2003 .

[5]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[6]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Resistance to Persuasion and Attitude Certainty: The Moderating Role of Elaboration , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  R. Petty,et al.  What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: the effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  Social judgeability : the impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes , 1994 .

[9]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Principle of congruity and reduction of persuasion. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[11]  David Mazursky,et al.  In the Aftermath of Invalidation: Shaping Judgment Rules on Learning That Previous Information Was Invalid , 2000 .

[12]  D. Papageorgis,et al.  Warning and persuasion. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion , 1979 .

[14]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  When resistance is futile: consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[16]  R. Petty,et al.  Ease of Retrieval Effects in Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  G. Salomon,et al.  Perseverance of bias as a function of debriefing conditions and subjects' confidence. , 1987 .

[18]  E. Stotland,et al.  The effects of prior information on susceptibility to an emotional appeal. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  R. Glen Hass,et al.  Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and resistance to influence , 1975 .

[21]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of MetaCognition in Social Judgment , 2006 .

[22]  Benoît Dardenne,et al.  Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions , 1998 .

[23]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review , 1998, Personality and Social Psychology Review.

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[26]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[27]  G. Bohner,et al.  When expertise backfires: contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[28]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Resistance and Persuasion , 2004 .

[29]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production , 1967 .

[30]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience With the Attitude Object , 2004 .

[31]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[32]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[33]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Message Within : The Role of Subjective Experience In Social Cognition And Behavior , 2000 .

[35]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[36]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  11. The role of metacognition in social judgment , 2007 .

[37]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[38]  Michael Ross,et al.  Bolstering Attitudes by Autobiographical Recall , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[39]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion , 2004 .

[40]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective. , 2004 .