Improving process safety: What roles for Digitalization and Industry 4.0?

[1]  William John Northcott.  Modeling Water Quantity and Quality on Tile Drained Watersheds With a GIS Coupled DRAINMOD , 1999 .

[2]  Hossam A. Gabbar,et al.  Experiment on distributed dynamic simulation for safety design of chemical plants , 2003, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[3]  D. Leal,et al.  ISO 15926 "Life Cycle Data for Process Plant": an Overview , 2005 .

[4]  J. Markoš,et al.  Steady States Analysis and Dynamic Simulation as a Complement in the Hazop Study of Chemical Reactors , 2005 .

[5]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  PHASuite: An Automated HAZOP Analysis Tool for Chemical Processes , 2005 .

[6]  Kazuhiko Suzuki,et al.  Dynamic simulator for evaluation of safety objects in batch process , 2005 .

[7]  Mordechai Shacham,et al.  Combining HAZOP with dynamic simulation—Applications for safety education , 2006 .

[8]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Large-scale dynamic simulation for security assessment of an ethylene oxide manufacturing process , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[9]  Naveed Ramzan,et al.  Application of extended Hazop and event‐tree analysis for investigating operational failures and safety optimization of distillation column unit , 2007 .

[10]  Brian Veitch,et al.  ExpHAZOP+: Knowledge-based expert system to conduct automated HAZOP analysis , 2009 .

[11]  Ian T. Cameron,et al.  Generating cause-implication graphs for process systems via blended hazard identification methods , 2011 .

[12]  Edward H. Glaessgen,et al.  The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles , 2012 .

[13]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Use of dynamic simulation for reactor safety analysis , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  Ian T. Cameron,et al.  A blended hazard identification methodology to support process diagnosis , 2012 .

[15]  Gürkan Sin,et al.  A simulation based engineering method to support HAZOP studies , 2012 .

[16]  Tiina M. Komulainen,et al.  Economic benefits of training simulators , 2012 .

[17]  R. Pitblado,et al.  Advanced Safety Barrier Management with Inclusion of Human and Organizational Aspects , 2013 .

[18]  Sten Bay Jørgensen,et al.  An integrated qualitative and quantitative modeling framework for computer‐assisted HAZOP studies , 2014 .

[19]  Juraj Labovský,et al.  Model-based hazard identification in multiphase chemical reactors , 2014 .

[20]  Masoud Soroush,et al.  Chemical Process Simulation for Dynamic Risk Analysis: A Steam–Methane Reformer Case Study , 2015 .

[21]  Maureen E. Hassall,et al.  Improving human control of hazards in industry , 2022, Safety and Health at Work.

[22]  Ian T. Cameron,et al.  New visualizations in the development of function and failure in process design and operations , 2016 .

[23]  Jianxin Kang,et al.  HAZOP analysis based on sensitivity evaluation , 2016 .

[24]  Nicola Paltrinieri,et al.  Dynamic risk analysis for Seveso sites , 2017 .

[25]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  Process hazard analysis, hazard identification and scenario definition: Are the conventional tools sufficient, or should and can we do much better? , 2017 .

[26]  Fatine Berdouzi,et al.  Dynamic simulation for risk analysis: Application to an exothermic reaction , 2018 .

[27]  Tiina M. Komulainen,et al.  Oil and Gas digital twins after twenty years. How can they be made sustainable, maintainable and useful? , 2018, Proceedings of The 59th Conference on imulation and Modelling (SIMS 59), 26-28 September 2018, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.

[28]  Tamás Varga,et al.  Process simulator assisted framework to support process safety analysis , 2019, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[29]  Jiayi Zhao,et al.  Comparing capability of scenario hazard identification methods by the PIC (Plant-People-Procedure Interaction Contribution) network metric , 2019, Safety Science.