Two odometers in honeybees?

SUMMARY Although several studies have examined how honeybees gauge and report the distance and direction of a food source to their nestmates, relatively little is known about how this information is combined to obtain a representation of the position of the food source. In this study we manipulate the amount of celestial compass information available to the bee during flight, and analyse the encoding of spatial information in the waggle dance as well as in the navigation of the foraging bee. We find that the waggle dance encodes information about the total distance flown to the food source, even when celestial compass cues are available only for a part of the journey. This stands in contrast to how a bee gauges distance flown when it navigates back to a food source that it already knows. When bees were trained to find a feeder placed at a fixed distance in a tunnel in which celestial cues were partially occluded and then tested in a tunnel that was fully open to the sky, they searched for the feeder at a distance that corresponds closely to the distance that was flown under the open sky during the training. Thus, when navigating back to a food source, information about distance travelled is disregarded when there is no concurrent input from the celestial compass. We suggest that bees may possess two different odometers – a `community' odometer that is used to provide information to nestmates via the dance, and a `personal' odometer that is used by an experienced individual to return to a previously visited source.

[1]  Zhang,et al.  Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  B Ronacher,et al.  Integrating two-dimensional paths: do desert ants process distance information in the absence of celestial compass cues? , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  R. Morse The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees , 1994 .

[4]  T. Seeley,et al.  Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  The POL area of the honey bee's eye: behavioural evidence , 1985 .

[6]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  How bees analyse the polarization patterns in the sky , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  T. Seeley,et al.  Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  Zhang,et al.  Visually mediated odometry in honeybees , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  Mandyam V. Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee navigation: properties of the visually driven `odometer' , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  K. Frisch,et al.  Die Polarisation des Himmelslichtes als orientierender Faktor bei den Tänzen der Bienen , 1949, Experientia.

[11]  Esch,et al.  Distance estimation by foraging honeybees , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  T. Collett,et al.  Flights of Learning , 1996 .

[13]  Allan W. Snyder,et al.  Polarised light detection in the bee,Apis mellifera , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  H. Esch,et al.  Honeybees use optic flow to measure the distance of a food source , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[15]  Nancy G. Solomon,et al.  Current indirect fitness benefits associated with philopatry in juvenile prairie voles , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  S. Wehner,et al.  Insect navigation: use of maps or Ariadne's thread ? , 1990 .

[17]  Randolf Menzel,et al.  Encoding spatial information in the waggle dance , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Peter Nordström,et al.  Twilight orientation to polarised light in the crepuscular dung beetle Scarabaeus zambesianus , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Evidence for counting in insects , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[20]  M V Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer". , 2000, Science.

[21]  Shaowu Zhang,et al.  Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow , 2001, Nature.

[22]  R Wehner,et al.  Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Can honey bees count landmarks? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee navigation: distance estimation in the third dimension , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  How do insects use path integration for their navigation? , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Matthew Collett,et al.  Path integration in insects , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Polarization vision in bees , 1986, Nature.

[28]  Thomas Labhart,et al.  Specialized photoreceptors at the dorsal rim of the honeybee's compound eye: Polarizational and angular sensitivity , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[29]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Vector navigation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis: celestial compass cues are essential for the proper use of distance information , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[30]  L. Chittka,et al.  The significance of landmarks for path integration in homing honeybee foragers , 1995, Naturwissenschaften.

[31]  R. Wehner,et al.  The bee's map of the e-vector pattern in the sky. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.