Epigenetic histone modifications of human transposable elements: genome defense versus exaptation

BackgroundTransposition is disruptive in nature and, thus, it is imperative for host genomes to evolve mechanisms that suppress the activity of transposable elements (TEs). At the same time, transposition also provides diverse sequences that can be exapted by host genomes as functional elements. These notions form the basis of two competing hypotheses pertaining to the role of epigenetic modifications of TEs in eukaryotic genomes: the genome defense hypothesis and the exaptation hypothesis. To date, all available evidence points to the genome defense hypothesis as the best explanation for the biological role of TE epigenetic modifications.ResultsWe evaluated several predictions generated by the genome defense hypothesis versus the exaptation hypothesis using recently characterized epigenetic histone modification data for the human genome. To this end, we mapped chromatin immunoprecipitation sequence tags from 38 histone modifications, characterized in CD4+ T cells, to the human genome and calculated their enrichment and depletion in all families of human TEs. We found that several of these families are significantly enriched or depleted for various histone modifications, both active and repressive. The enrichment of human TE families with active histone modifications is consistent with the exaptation hypothesis and stands in contrast to previous analyses that have found mammalian TEs to be exclusively repressively modified. Comparisons between TE families revealed that older families carry more histone modifications than younger ones, another observation consistent with the exaptation hypothesis. However, data from within family analyses on the relative ages of epigenetically modified elements are consistent with both the genome defense and exaptation hypotheses. Finally, TEs located proximal to genes carry more histone modifications than the ones that are distal to genes, as may be expected if epigenetically modified TEs help to regulate the expression of nearby host genes.ConclusionsWith a few exceptions, most of our findings support the exaptation hypothesis for the role of TE epigenetic modifications when vetted against the genome defense hypothesis. The recruitment of epigenetic modifications may represent an additional mechanism by which TEs can contribute to the regulatory functions of their host genomes.

[1]  R. Durbin,et al.  Mapping Quality Scores Mapping Short Dna Sequencing Reads and Calling Variants Using P

, 2022 .

[2]  J. Jurka,et al.  Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[3]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[4]  D. Landsman,et al.  Repetitive DNA elements, nucleosome binding and human gene expression. , 2009, Gene.

[5]  R. Martienssen,et al.  Epigenetic interactions between transposons and genes: lessons from plants. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  R. Martienssen,et al.  Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[7]  S. Gould,et al.  Exaptation—a Missing Term in the Science of Form , 1982, Paleobiology.

[8]  M. Matzke,et al.  Transgene silencing by the host genome defense: implications for the evolution of epigenetic control mechanisms in plants and vertebrates , 2000, Plant Molecular Biology.

[9]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[10]  J. Issa,et al.  Enrichment for Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation at Alu Repeats in Human Cells* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Ira M. Hall,et al.  Regulation of Heterochromatic Silencing and Histone H3 Lysine-9 Methylation by RNAi , 2002, Science.

[12]  Martin Radolf,et al.  The profile of repeat‐associated histone lysine methylation states in the mouse epigenome , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. , 1982 .

[14]  C. Feschotte.  Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  Terrence S. Furey,et al.  The UCSC Genome Browser Database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  F. Crick,et al.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite , 1980, Nature.

[17]  S. Grewal,et al.  Heterochromatin revisited , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  C. Schmid,et al.  Specific Alu Binding Protein from Human Sperm Chromatin Prevents DNA Methylation (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  M. Matzke,et al.  Host defenses to transposable elements and the evolution of genomic imprinting , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[20]  D. M. Power.  Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research; Statistical Tables , 1970 .

[21]  I King Jordan,et al.  Transposable elements and the evolution of eukaryotic complexity. , 2002, Current issues in molecular biology.

[22]  David G. Harris,et al.  Conserved fragments of transposable elements in intergenic regions: evidence for widespread recruitment of MIR- and L2-derived sequences within the mouse and human genomes. , 2003, Genetical research.

[23]  S. Batalov,et al.  A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  V. Kapitonov,et al.  The age of Alu subfamilies , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  E. Lander,et al.  The Mammalian Epigenome , 2007, Cell.

[26]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[27]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[28]  J. Jurka.  Subfamily structure and evolution of the human L1 family of repetive sequences , 1989, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[29]  International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome , 2001, Nature.

[30]  Kenta Nakai,et al.  DBTSS: DataBase of human Transcriptional Start Sites and full-length cDNAs , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  J. Jurka,et al.  A universal classification of eukaryotic transposable elements implemented in Repbase , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  R. Martienssen,et al.  Dependence of Heterochromatic Histone H3 Methylation Patterns on the Arabidopsis Gene DDM1 , 2002, Science.

[33]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution , 1980, Nature.

[34]  R. Martienssen,et al.  The role of RNA interference in heterochromatic silencing , 2004, Nature.

[35]  S. Grewal,et al.  Transcription and RNA interference in the formation of heterochromatin , 2007, Nature.

[36]  A. Bird,et al.  DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  A. Aszódi,et al.  H3K27me3 forms BLOCs over silent genes and intergenic regions and specifies a histone banding pattern on a mouse autosomal chromosome. , 2009, Genome research.

[38]  M. G. Kidwell,et al.  Transposable elements and host genome evolution. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  D. Rio.  Molecular mechanisms regulating Drosophila P element transposition. , 1990, Annual review of genetics.

[40]  Michael Black,et al.  Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control , 2004, Nature.

[41]  Robert A. Martienssen,et al.  Noncoding RNAs and Gene Silencing , 2007, Cell.

[42]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[43]  C. Walsh,et al.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.