Rise And Fall Of Platforms: Systematic Analysis Of Platform Dynamics Thanks To Axiomatic Design

While platforms are multiplying across industries, the laws governing their dynamic are still poorly understood. The high diversity of disciplines covering the topic, spanning from strategy management to engineering design, made it difficult for any new model to integrate the numerous phenomena at stakes. In a new effort to bring them together, we exhibit Suh's Axiomatic Design as an ideal framework to systematically analyse platforms dynamics when market and technology forces meet and interact. Exporting the current description of platforms from Design Structure Matrices to Design Matrices, our research enables us to systematically explore platforms potential evolutions. While the model leads us to rediscover classical behaviours, it also uncovers new results, such as situations of split leadership and platform overthrow, in which complementors challenge the platform leader. Both can be linked to two necessary conditions: functional generativity and technical genericity. We then identify those behaviours in several cases.

[1]  A. Gawer Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[2]  C Antoine,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity , 2013 .

[3]  nnabelle Gawer,et al.  ridging differing perspectives on technological platforms : oward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[4]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  With friends like these: the art of managing complementors. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[5]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[6]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Structuring the Smartphone Industry: Is the Mobile Internet OS Platform the Key? , 2011 .

[7]  M. Meyer,et al.  Revitalize Your Product Lines Through Continuous Platform Renewal , 1997 .

[8]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[9]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps , 2017 .

[10]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry architecture as a determinant of successful platform strategies: a case study of the i‐mode mobile Internet service , 2009 .

[11]  Olga Kokshagina,et al.  Designing techniques for systemic impact: lessons from C-K theory and matroid structures , 2016, Research in Engineering Design.

[12]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[13]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[14]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Building a Company on Internet Time: Lessons from Netscape , 1999 .

[15]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  DESIGNING A REQUIREMENT DRIVEN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS , 2001 .

[16]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[17]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[18]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[19]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .