A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research

Current thinking in design science research (DSR) defines the usefulness of the design artifact in a relevant problem environment as the primary research goal. Here we propose a complementary evaluation model for DSR. Drawing from evolutionary economics, we define a fitness-utility model that better captures the evolutionary nature of design improvements and the essential DSR nature of searching for a satisfactory design across a fitness landscape. Our goal is to move DSR to more meaningful evaluations of design artifacts for sustainable impacts. A key premise of this new thinking is that the evolutionary fitness of a design artifact is more valuable than its immediate usefulness. We conclude with a discussion of the strengths and challenges of the fitness-utility model for the performance of rigorous and relevant DSR.

[1]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[2]  W. Hines,et al.  Evolutionary Stable Strategies: A Review of Basic Theory , 1987 .

[3]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[5]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[6]  Harlan D. Mills,et al.  Cleanroom Software Engineering , 1987, IEEE Software.

[7]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[8]  D. Ariely.  Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2008 .

[9]  C. Allen,et al.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2011 .

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[11]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Design science and the accumulation of knowledge in the information systems discipline , 2012, TMIS.

[12]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  The , 1966 .

[13]  George T. Heineman.  Adaptation and software architecture , 1998, ISAW '98.

[14]  Benn Lawson,et al.  Innovator'S Dilemma , 2015 .

[15]  T. Grandon Gill,et al.  Illusions of Significance in a Rugged Landscape , 2008, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[16]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Three Levels of End-User Tailoring: Customization, Integration, and Extension , 2003 .

[17]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[18]  Bjarne Stroustrup,et al.  C++ Programming Language , 1986, IEEE Softw..

[19]  D. Upadhyay.  The Upside of Irrationality: The Unexpected Benefits of Defying Logic at Work and at Home , 2013 .

[20]  T MarchSalvatore,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995 .

[21]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Editorial: Design science, grand challenges, and societal impacts , 2011, TMIS.

[23]  Anders I. Mørch,et al.  Three levels of end-user tailoring: customization, integration, and extension , 1997 .

[24]  Ray Bert,et al.  \IWhere Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation\N By Steven Johnson. New York City: Riverhead Books, 2010. , 2010 .

[25]  Olle Häggström,et al.  The Cult of Statistical Significance , 2009 .

[26]  Chris Arney.  Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder , 2013 .

[27]  E. Hippel.  Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[28]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Design of emerging digital services: a taxonomy , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Principles of Information Systems Analysis and Design , 1986 .

[30]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Toward a broader vision for Information Systems , 2011, TMIS.

[31]  Max D. Hopper.  Rattling SABRE—new ways to compete on information , 1990 .

[32]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[34]  Steven Johnson.  Steven Johnson: Where good ideas come from , 2010 .

[35]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Towards an understanding of the use of problem and design spaces during object-oriented system development , 2002, Inf. Organ..

[36]  W. Polonsky,et al.  The Tipping Point , 2007, The Diabetes educator.

[37]  William B. Mesa.  Made to Stick , 2008 .

[38]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[39]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[40]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[41]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[42]  James A. Tebbe.  Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation , 2011 .

[43]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Whom are we informing? issues and recommendations for MIS research from an informing sciences perspective 1 , 2009 .

[44]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER IN EVOLUTION: SELF-ORGANIZATION AND SELECTION , 1992 .

[45]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[46]  David P. Barash,et al.  Economics as an evolutionary science : from utility to fitness , 2002 .

[47]  NiedermanFred,et al.  Design science and the accumulation of knowledge in the information systems discipline , 2012 .

[48]  D. Dennett.  Memes and the Exploitation of Imagination , 2021, Philosophy after Darwin.

[49]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Marshall F Chalverus,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[51]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[52]  F. W. Fox,et al.  Our changing population. , 1965, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[53]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[54]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[55]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[56]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  The C Programming Language , 1978 .

[57]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[58]  R. Lewontin.  ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[59]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[60]  Lynda M. Applegate,et al.  Revolution in real time: managing information technology in the 1990s , 1991 .

[61]  T. Grandon Gill,et al.  A Psychologically Plausible Goal-Based Utility Function , 2008, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[62]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..