Building Weighted-Domain Composite Indices of Life Satisfaction with Data Envelopment Analysis

The specialised literature has frequently addressed the relationship between life domains and people’s satisfaction with life. Some researchers have posed questions regarding the importance of domains, therefore interpreting them as weightings and creating domain satisfaction indices. This paper illustrates how Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques can be employed to compute domain-based composite indices of life satisfaction and weightings for life domains. Furthermore, an empirical application is performed on a sample of 178 people living in a rural community in Yucatan (Mexico). One of the main features of the aforementioned techniques is that weightings might differ from one individual to another. Accordingly, several weighting schemes are used to compute different life satisfaction indices, in addition to a constant equally-weighted index. Based on the goodness-of-fit criteria commonly used in this literature, our main result is that DEA-MCDM indicators of life satisfaction do not improve the relationship with self-reported life satisfaction in comparison to the equally-weighted index.

[1]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[2]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[3]  J. A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability , 2011 .

[4]  E. Wills.  Spirituality and Subjective Well-Being: Evidences for a New Domain in the Personal Well-Being Index , 2009 .

[5]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  G. Coenders,et al.  Non-linearity, Complexity and Limited Measurement in the Relationship Between Satisfaction with Specific Life Domains and Satisfaction with Life as a Whole , 2010 .

[7]  M. García-Rubio,et al.  Water Access and Subjective Well-Being: The Case of Sucre, Bolivia , 2014 .

[8]  Mariano Rojas,et al.  Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: is it a simple relationship? , 2006 .

[9]  Chia-huei Wu.  Can We Weight Satisfaction Score with Importance Ranks Across Life Domains? , 2008 .

[10]  Rolf Färe,et al.  An Economic Approach to Achievement and Improvement Indexes , 2001 .

[11]  Giovanni Angelini,et al.  DEA-Like Model and Common Weights Approach for the Construction of a Subjective Community Well-Being Indicator , 2013 .

[12]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[13]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  The methodology of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[14]  Health and the quality of life , 2000 .

[15]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Ernest Reig-Martínez,et al.  Social and Economic Wellbeing in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: Building an Enlarged Human Development Indicator , 2013 .

[17]  P. Varca,et al.  A Comparison Between Bottom–Up, Top–Down, and Bidirectional Models of Relationships Between Global and Life Facet Satisfaction , 1989 .

[18]  Mónica Domínguez-Serrano,et al.  A Gender Wellbeing Composite Indicator: The Best-Worst Global Evaluation Approach , 2011 .

[19]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  C. Hsieh.  To Weight or not to Weight: The Role of Domain Importance in Quality of Life Measurement , 2004 .

[21]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[22]  F. González‐Gómez,et al.  The Influence of Water Access in Subjective Well-Being: Some Evidence in Yucatan, Mexico , 2013 .

[23]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators , 2007 .

[24]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[25]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[27]  Mariano Rojas.  Experienced Poverty and Income Poverty in Mexico: A Subjective Well-Being Approach , 2008 .

[28]  C. Hsieh.  Issues in Evaluating Importance Weighting in Quality of Life Measures , 2013 .

[29]  Akihiro Hashimoto,et al.  Has Livability of Japan Gotten Better for 1956–1990?: a Dea Approach , 1997 .

[30]  Chia-huei Wu,et al.  Do We Need to Weight Item Satisfaction by Item Importance? A Perspective from Locke’s Range-Of-Affect Hypothesis , 2006 .

[31]  F. González‐Gómez,et al.  Does higher income equal higher levels of happiness in every society? The case of the Mayan people , 2013 .

[32]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  P. Converse,et al.  The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions , 1976 .

[34]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Chia-huei Wu.  Enhancing quality of life by shifting importance perception among life domains , 2009 .

[36]  C. Hsieh.  Counting Importance: The Case of Life Satisfaction and Relative Domain Importance , 2003 .

[37]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[38]  F. Førsund,et al.  Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units , 1996 .

[39]  A. Oswald,et al.  Unhappiness and Unemployment , 1994 .

[40]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[41]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  The Relationship between Subjective Well-being and Domain Satisfactions in South Africa , 2001 .

[42]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  C. Kao,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[44]  Ines Herrero,et al.  A modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics , 2010 .

[45]  Antonio Jurado,et al.  Construction and Evolution of a Multidimensional Well-Being Index for the Spanish Regions , 2012 .

[46]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[47]  A. Wearing,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being , 1991 .

[48]  Paul Frijters,et al.  The Anatomy of Subjective Well-Being , 2001 .

[49]  C. Hsieh.  Importance is Not Unimportant: The Role of Importance Weighting in QOL Measures , 2012 .

[50]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune's best cities , 2001 .

[51]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[52]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[53]  P. Murias,et al.  An Economic Wellbeing Index for the Spanish Provinces: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2006 .

[54]  Chia-huei Wu,et al.  Importance has been Considered in Satisfaction Evaluation: an Experimental Examination of Locke’s Range-of-affect Hypothesis , 2007 .

[55]  Nicky Rogge,et al.  Granting Teachers the "Benefit of the Doubt" in Performance Evaluations. , 2009 .

[56]  Robert A. Cummins,et al.  The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos , 1996 .

[57]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[58]  Jakob B. Madsen.  Book review: Basic Econometrics, Damodar N. Gujarati, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995 , 1998 .