Interrater reliability of an etiologic classification of ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Precise identification of the cause of stroke is critical to research and clinical practice. Published series of ischemic stroke show considerable variation in the proportion of cases classified as atherosclerotic large-vessel disease, lacunar infarct, cardioembolic stroke, stroke of other known cause, and stroke of undetermined etiology. We describe the development and use of an etiology-specific classification of ischemic stroke. The interrater reliability of the classification is then evaluated. METHODS A total of 160 cases of ischemic strokes in young adults were reviewed by paired neurologists who assigned cases to prioritized categories. The results of paired ratings were evaluated for each of the potential causes. Interrater agreement was assessed by means of kappa, which is the chance-adjusted percent agreement. RESULTS For standard pairs, kappa was fair to good for all causes except lacunar stroke (kappa = 0.31); however, pair-to-pair variation was greatest for lacunar strokes. Strokes of undetermined cause and hematologic/other cause were of borderline fair reliability. CONCLUSIONS The utility of a stroke classification system is dependent on its intended use. An etiologic classification is useful in studies of the epidemiology and pathophysiological basis of stroke. Fair to good reliability for an etiologic classification of stroke can be obtained when criteria are explicit.

[1]  R. Macko,et al.  Pregnancy and the risk of stroke , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Janssen,et al.  Stroke in young black patients. Risk factors, subtypes, and prognosis. , 1995, Stroke.

[3]  J. Slattery,et al.  Interobserver Reliability of a Clinical Classification of Acute Cerebral Infarction , 1993, Stroke.

[4]  H. Adams,et al.  Interphysician agreement in the diagnosis of subtypes of acute ischemic stroke , 1993, Neurology.

[5]  David Lee Gordon,et al.  Classification of Subtype of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Definitions for Use in a Multicenter Clinical Trial , 1993, Stroke.

[6]  E. Loeliger Cardiogenic embolism to the brain , 1992, The Lancet.

[7]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  C. V. van Donselaar,et al.  Reliability of the diagnosis of a first seizure , 1989, Neurology.

[9]  Daniel B Hier,et al.  The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. , 1988, Stroke.

[10]  Daniel B Hier,et al.  Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of stroke type. , 1986, Archives of neurology.

[11]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[13]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[14]  H. Freyberger,et al.  Interrater Reliability in the Assessment of Neurovascular Diseases , 1991 .

[15]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  S. Hatano,et al.  Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. , 1976, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.