Hierarchical cluster analysis of progression patterns in open-angle glaucoma patients with medical treatment.

PURPOSE To classify medically treated open-angle glaucoma (OAG) by the pattern of progression using hierarchical cluster analysis, and to determine OAG progression characteristics by comparing clusters. METHODS Ninety-five eyes of 95 OAG patients who received medical treatment, and who had undergone visual field (VF) testing at least once per year for 5 or more years. OAG was classified into subgroups using hierarchical cluster analysis based on the following five variables: baseline mean deviation (MD), baseline visual field index (VFI), MD slope, VFI slope, and Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) printout. After that, other parameters were compared between clusters. RESULTS Two clusters were made after a hierarchical cluster analysis. Cluster 1 showed -4.06 ± 2.43 dB baseline MD, 92.58% ± 6.27% baseline VFI, -0.28 ± 0.38 dB per year MD slope, -0.52% ± 0.81% per year VFI slope, and all "no progression" cases in GPA printout, whereas cluster 2 showed -8.68 ± 3.81 baseline MD, 77.54 ± 12.98 baseline VFI, -0.72 ± 0.55 MD slope, -2.22 ± 1.89 VFI slope, and seven "possible" and four "likely" progression cases in GPA printout. There were no significant differences in age, sex, mean IOP, central corneal thickness, and axial length between clusters. However, cluster 2 included more high-tension glaucoma patients and used a greater number of antiglaucoma eye drops significantly compared with cluster 1. CONCLUSIONS Hierarchical cluster analysis of progression patterns divided OAG into slow and fast progression groups, evidenced by assessing the parameters of glaucomatous progression in VF testing. In the fast progression group, the prevalence of high-tension glaucoma was greater and the number of antiglaucoma medications administered was increased versus the slow progression group.

[1]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Rate and amount of visual loss in 102 patients with open-angle glaucoma followed up for at least 15 years. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  G. Spaeth,et al.  The glaucomatous process and the evolving definition of glaucoma. , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.

[4]  J Katz,et al.  Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  R. P. Mills,et al.  Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[6]  H. Quigley,et al.  Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  R. Ritch,et al.  Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  Gang Li,et al.  Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[9]  F W Fitzke,et al.  Comparison of visual field progression in patients with normal pressure glaucoma between eyes with and without visual field loss that threatens fixation , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Visual field change in low-tension glaucoma over a five-year follow-up. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Young H. Kwon,et al.  Primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  P. Lichter,et al.  Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[13]  I. Gutteridge Normal tension glaucoma: diagnostic features and comparisons with primary open angle glaucoma , 2000, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[14]  Catherine A McCarty,et al.  Progression of visual field loss in open angle glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project , 2006, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[15]  B. Prum,et al.  The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS): 7. the relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration , 2000 .

[16]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. , 2003, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[17]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Natural history of open-angle glaucoma. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[18]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Kuldev Singh,et al.  Axial Length Does Not Correlate With Degree of Visual Field Loss in Myopic Chinese Individuals With Glaucomatous Appearing Optic Nerves , 2009, Journal of glaucoma.

[20]  M. B. Shields,et al.  Normal-tension glaucoma: is it different from primary open-angle glaucoma? , 2008, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[21]  J. Caprioli Intraocular pressure fluctuation: an independent risk factor for glaucoma? , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  D. C. Wu,et al.  Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  H R Taylor,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma: results from the visual impairment project. , 2001, Ophthalmology.