Effects of Underlining Textbook Sentences on Passage and Sentence Retention.

Abstract Below average college freshmen read an 1844‐word selection about the Kalahari Desert. The experimental group underlined one sentence per paragraph, and the control group only read the passage. Afterwards subjects took a multiple‐choice test of items drawn from superordinate and subordinate sentences. While overall passage retention was not improved, underlined sentences were recalled better than nonunderlined sentences, and superordinate sentences, whether or not underlined, were retained better than subordinate sentences by the experimental but not by the control group. When a review was added in a second experiment, passage retention was still not improved. This time both experimental and control groups retained superordinate sentences better than subordinate sentences. Underlining subordinate sentences improved their retention even above that achieved by the control group. Results suggest that without review, underlining helped these below average students sort out superordinate ideas. With re...

[1]  Samuel A. Bobrow,et al.  COMPREHENSION AND RECALL OF SENTENCES , 1969 .

[2]  John P. Rickards,et al.  The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking , 1978 .

[3]  William B. Todd,et al.  Influence of response mode, sex, reading ability, and level of difficulty on four measures of recall of meaningful written material. , 1971 .

[4]  片玲子.  The effect of the amount of underlining on comprehension and retention of textbook prose Material , 1978 .

[5]  B. Meyer.  The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[6]  Gerald J. August,et al.  Generative underlining strategies in prose recall. , 1975 .

[7]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  The Effects of Notetaking and Test Expectancy on the Learning of Text Material. , 1975 .

[8]  R. Fowler,et al.  Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material. , 1974 .

[9]  Kalmer E. Stordahl,et al.  The Effect of Study Techniques on Comprehension and Retention , 1956 .

[10]  Barry J. Schwartz,et al.  Effect of question production and answering on prose recall. , 1975 .

[11]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[12]  M. Wittrock.  Learning as a Generative Process , 1974 .

[13]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Thematic Processes in the Comprehension of Technical Prose. , 1982 .

[14]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[15]  Valjean M. Cashen,et al.  Role of the Isolation Effect in a Formal Educational Setting. , 1970 .

[16]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Underlining versus repetitive reading. , 1972 .

[17]  Peter W. Hoon.  Efficacy of Three Common Study Methods , 1974 .

[18]  Walter Pauk,et al.  How to study in college , 1962 .

[19]  J. L. Mistler-Lachman,et al.  Depth of comprehension and sentence memory , 1974 .

[20]  J. L. Santa,et al.  Effects of Notetaking and Studying on the Retention of Prose , 1979 .

[21]  Edward B. Fry,et al.  Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, Validity, and Extension to Level 17. , 1977 .

[22]  Gary M. Schumacher,et al.  Effects of Motivation, Subject Activity, and Readability on the Retention of Prose Materials. , 1978 .

[23]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Meaningful processing of sentences. , 1971 .

[24]  Henry F. Arnold.  The comparative effectiveness of certain study techniques in the field of history. , 1942 .

[25]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[26]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[27]  C. O. Mathews.  Comparison of methods of study for immediate and delayed recall. , 1938 .