Integrating ecosystem sampling, gradient modeling, remote sensing, and ecosystem simulation to create spatially explicit landscape inventories

Keane, Robert E.; Rollins, Matthew G.; McNicoll, Cecilia H.; Parsons, Russell A. 2002. Integrating ecosystem sampling, gradient modeling, remote sensing, and ecosystem simulation to create spatially explicit landscape inventories. RMRS-GTR-92. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. De­ partment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 61 p. Presented is a prototype of the Landscape Ecosystem Inventory System (LEIS), a system for creating maps of important landscape characteristics for natural resource planning. This system uses gradient-based field inventories coupled with gradient modeling remote sensing, ecosystem simulation, and statistical analyses to derive spatial data layers required for ecosystem manage­ ment. Field data were collected in two large (more than 10,000 km) study areas along important environmental gradients using modified ECODATA methods. A multilevel database was used to derive response variables for predictive landscape mapping from the ECODATA database. Link­ age of gradient models with remote sensing allows a standardized, flexible, detailed, and compre­ hensive classification of landscape characteristics. Over 40 spatially explicit variables were de­ rived for each study area using existing spatial data, satellite imagery, and ecosystem simulation. This spatial database (the LEIS GIS) described landscape-scale indirect, direct, and resource gradients and provided predictor variables for multivariate predictive landscape models. Statistical programs and GIS were used to spatially model several landscape characteristics as a proof of concept for the LEIS. These proof-of-concept products were: (1) basal area, (2) western redcedar habitat, and (3) fuel models. Output maps were between 65 percent and 90 percent accurate when compared to reference data from each study area. Main strengths of the LEIS approach include: (1) a standardized, repeatable approach to sampling and database development for landscape assessment, (2) combining remote sensing, ecosystem simulation, and gradient modeling to cre­ ate predictive landscape models, (3) flexibility in terms of potential maps generated from LEIS, and (4) the use of direct, resource, and functional gradient analysis for mapping landscape character­ istics.

[1]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain , 1997 .

[2]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest extent and regenerative stage using remotely sensed data , 1994 .

[3]  H. Bugmann A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients , 1996 .

[4]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[5]  T. Tsegaye,et al.  Incorporation of digital elevation models with Landsat-TM data to improve land cover classification accuracy , 2000 .

[6]  Guofan Shao,et al.  Forest cover types derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery for Changbai Mountain area of China , 1996 .

[7]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  MTCLIM: a mountain microclimate simulation model , 1989 .

[8]  J. Brockhaus,et al.  Classification of timberland productivity in Northwestern California using Landsat, topographic, and ecological data , 1985 .

[9]  Robert A. Malin,et al.  Implications of patterns of carbon pools and fluxes across a semiarid environmental gradient , 1998 .

[10]  W. Hurst The Society for Range Management , 1985 .

[11]  Alan S. Weakley,et al.  International classification of ecological communities: terrestrial vegetation of the United States , 1995 .

[12]  John R. Jones An experiment in modeling Rocky Mountain forest ecosystems , 1971 .

[13]  Ronald I. Miller Mapping the Diversity of Nature , 1994 .

[14]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating Daily Surfaces of Temperature and Precipitation over Complex Topography , 1996 .

[15]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[16]  David L. Verbyla,et al.  Satellite Remote Sensing of Natural Resources , 1995 .

[17]  H. Gleason,et al.  The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1939 .

[18]  F. Woodward Climate and plant distribution , 1987 .

[19]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Vegetation survey design for conservation: Gradsect sampling of forests in North-eastern New South Wales , 1989 .

[20]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[21]  飯塚 寛,et al.  Aspect transformation in site productivity research , 1967 .

[22]  W. Emmingham Ecological indexes as a means of evaluating climate, species distribution, and primary production , 1982 .

[23]  Torrey Botanical Club Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club , 1996 .

[24]  C. Braak,et al.  Unimodal models to relate species to environment , 1988 .

[25]  C. Brodley,et al.  Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data , 1997 .

[26]  J. Gosz,et al.  Gradient Analysis of Ecological Change in Time and Space: Implications for Forest Management. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  H. Anderson Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior , 1982 .

[28]  K. R. W. Brewer,et al.  The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource surveys , 1985 .

[29]  Steven T. Knick,et al.  Supervised classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery in a semi-arid rangeland by nonparametric discriminant analysis , 1997 .

[30]  J. Michaelsen,et al.  Regression Tree Analysis of satellite and terrain data to guide vegetation sampling and surveys , 1994 .

[31]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[32]  F. P. Kapinos,et al.  Hydrologic unit maps , 1987 .

[33]  J. Franklin Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients , 1995 .

[34]  R. H. Hamre,et al.  Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences , 1996 .

[35]  Ross B. Cunningham,et al.  Altitudinal distribution of several eucalypt species in relation to other environmental factors in southern New South Wales , 1983 .

[36]  S. Running,et al.  Global dynamic vegetation modelling: coupling biogeochemistry and biogeography models , 1996 .

[37]  S. Arno Forest Fire History in the Northern Rockies , 1980, Journal of Forestry.

[38]  Hong S. He,et al.  INTEGRATION OF GIS DATA AND CLASSIFIED SATELLITE IMAGERY FOR REGIONAL FOREST ASSESSMENT , 1998 .

[39]  R. Keane,et al.  Mapping vegetation and fuels for fire management on the Gila National Forest Complex, New Mexico , 2000 .

[40]  R. Peet,et al.  Gradient analysis of forests of the Sangre de Cristo Range, Colorado. , 1990 .

[41]  S. Running,et al.  FOREST-BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[42]  M. Linder,et al.  Developing adaptive forest management strategies to cope with climate change. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[43]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Spatial modeling in forest management and natural resource planning. , 2000 .

[44]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  Development of input data layers for the FARSITE fire growth model for the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness Complex, USA , 1998 .

[45]  Robert L. Edmonds,et al.  Analysis of coniferous forest ecosystems in the Western United States , 1982 .

[46]  T. N. Shiflet Rangeland cover types of the United States. , 1994 .

[47]  J. Blaszczyński,et al.  LANDFORM CHARACTERIZATION WITH GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[48]  Matthew G. Rollins,et al.  Mapping Fire Regimes Across Time and Space: Understanding Coarse and Fine-scale Fire Patterns , 2001 .

[49]  N. Lam,et al.  Environmental analysis using integrated GIS and remotely sensed data - Some research needs and priorities , 1991 .

[50]  System for analysis of LANDSAT agricultural data: Automatic computer-assisted proportion estimation of local areas , 1976 .

[51]  James K. Brown,et al.  Surface Fuel Loadings and Prediced Fire Behavior for Vegetation Types in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 1986 .

[52]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Improved classification of forest vegetation in northern Wisconsin through a rule-based combination of soils, terrain, and Landsat Thematic Mapper data , 1992 .

[53]  Felix Müller,et al.  Gradients in ecological systems , 1998 .

[54]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[55]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[56]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Gis and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issues , 1996 .

[57]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at Multiple Scales , 1985 .

[58]  S. Running,et al.  Global Terrestrial Gross and Net Primary Productivity from the Earth Observing System , 2000 .

[59]  J. E. Pinder,et al.  Forest mapping at Lassen volcanic national park, California, using Landsat TM data and a geographical information system , 1995 .

[60]  G. De’ath PRINCIPAL CURVES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR INDIRECT AND DIRECT GRADIENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[61]  Daniel M. Leavell,et al.  Vegetation and process of the Kootenai National Forest , 2000 .

[62]  J. Lyon,et al.  Gradient analysis in a riparian landscape: contrasts among forest layers , 1997 .

[63]  J. L. Barker,et al.  Landsat MSS and TM post-calibration dynamic ranges , 1986 .

[64]  Rory Nathan,et al.  Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation , 1990 .

[65]  Thomas M. Quigley,et al.  An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins: volume 1. , 1997 .

[66]  M. Huston,et al.  A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities , 1989, Vegetatio.

[67]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Vegetation characteristics and primary productivity along an arctic transect: implications for scaling‐up , 1999 .

[68]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Fire Frequency and Subalpine Forest Succession Along a Topographic Gradient in Wyoming , 1981 .

[69]  C. Field,et al.  Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. , 1995 .

[70]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Mapping regions climatically suitable for particular species: an example using Africa , 1989 .

[71]  A. Finklin Climate of the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, central Idaho , 1988 .

[72]  J. Clark Effects of long-term water balances on fire regime, north-western Minnesota , 1989 .

[73]  D. Patten Vegetational Pattern in Relation to Environments in the Madison Range, Montana , 1963 .

[74]  R. Whittaker,et al.  GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION* , 1967, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[75]  M. Austin,et al.  Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory , 1994 .

[76]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Regional ecosystem simulation: Combining surface- and satellite-based observations to study linkages between terrestrial energy and mass budgets , 1998 .

[77]  R. Itami,et al.  GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression : a study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel , 1991 .

[78]  D. Tew,et al.  Ecological Land Classification: Applications to Identify the Productive Potential of Southern Forests , 1991 .

[79]  David W. Roberts,et al.  Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: a second approximation , 1991 .

[80]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984, Vegetatio.

[81]  S. Running,et al.  8 – Generalization of a Forest Ecosystem Process Model for Other Biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an Application for Global-Scale Models , 1993 .

[82]  A. Falconer,et al.  Remote sensing and ecosystem management , 1977 .

[83]  Bernard L. Kovalchik,et al.  Forest habitat types of Montana. , 1977 .

[84]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Landscape-scale controls over 20th century fire occurrence in two large Rocky Mountain (USA) wilderness areas , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[85]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Statistical Rigor and Practical Utility in Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment , 2001 .

[86]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada , 1980 .

[87]  M. Austin,et al.  Models for the analysis of species' response to environmental gradients , 2004, Vegetatio.

[88]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[89]  E. Schanda,et al.  Remote sensing of the environment , 1978, Naturwissenschaften.

[90]  F. Kienast,et al.  A simulated map of the potential natural forest vegetation of Switzerland , 1993 .

[91]  C. Hall,et al.  The distribution and abundance of organisms as a consequence of energy balances along multiple environmental gradients , 1992 .

[92]  I. Hiscock Communities and Ecosystems , 1970, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[93]  R. Moral,et al.  Gradient modeling, Resource and fire management , 2004, Vegetatio.

[94]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  Integrated scientific assessment for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. , 1996 .

[95]  C. D. Bevins,et al.  Simulating coarse-scale vegetation dynamics using the Columbia River Basin succession model-crbsum. Forest Service general technical report , 1996 .

[96]  B. V. Barnes,et al.  An Ecological Climatic Classification of Michigan: A Quantitative Approach , 1988, Forest Science.

[97]  David R. Miller Forest stand dynamics , 1997 .

[98]  Andrew M. Barton Gradient analysis of relationships among fire, environment, and vegetation in a southwestern USA mountain range' , 1994 .

[99]  A. Prasad,et al.  PREDICTING ABUNDANCE OF 80 TREE SPECIES FOLLOWING CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[100]  Steven W. Running,et al.  A biophysical soil–site model for estimating potential productivity of forested landscapes , 1996 .

[101]  Thomas A. Spies,et al.  REGIONAL GRADIENT ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL PATTERN OF WOODY PLANT COMMUNITIES OF OREGON FORESTS , 1998 .

[102]  Stephen R. Kessell,et al.  Gradient modeling: A new approach to fire modeling and wilderness resource management , 1977 .

[103]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes , 2000 .

[104]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 5-1994 Testing Forest-BGC Ecosystem Process Simulations Across a Climatic Gradient in Oregon , 2018 .

[105]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[106]  Richard L. Everett,et al.  Eastside forest ecosystem health assessment , 1994 .

[107]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Methods in Ecosystem Science , 2000, Springer New York.

[108]  Daniel G. Brown Predicting vegetation types at treeline using topography and biophysical disturbance variables , 1994 .

[109]  S. Running,et al.  Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: Sensitivity to remotely-sensed leaf area index estimates , 1993 .

[110]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[111]  G. M. Foody The Continuum of Classification Fuzziness in Thematic Mapping , 1999 .

[112]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a β‐function , 1994 .

[113]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .