Passive House at the Crossroads: The Past and the Present of a Voluntary Standard That Managed to Bridge the Energy Efficiency Gap

Improving energy efficiency in dwellings is generally seen as the low-hanging fruit of climate change mitigation. In particular decreased heat loss through better insulation is suggested as one of the most cost-effective means to achieve the ambitious national and international goals of climate gas reduction. However, the literature shows that a profitable technological solution is not sufficient to reach the energy goals. Aspects such as a lack of information, unobserved costs, and heterogeneity among users can compromise the success of technical innovation. Still, there are successful concepts that drive the technological development in the construction sector. The Passive House is an example for such innovations that manage to bridge the energy efficiency gap. This paper addresses the Passive House concept and standard as a success story of technological innovation. With Bruno Latour's Science in Action (1987) as a starting point, we describe the conditions under which the standard was created, the role of the network built around the Passive House Institute, and the consequences of exporting the standard. We identify success factors that have supported the diffusion of the Passive House standard and concept and discuss its possible development in the current situation which is characterized by its wide-spread adoption.

[1]  M. Aune.  Energy comes home , 2007 .

[2]  U. Dangel.  Nachhaltige Architektur in Vorarlberg , 2010 .

[3]  Erwin H. Bulte,et al.  Does the Energy-Efficiency Paradox Exist? Technological Progress and Uncertainty , 2001 .

[4]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  Why don't people weatherize their homes? An ethnographic solution☆ , 1985 .

[5]  R. Perlman,et al.  Families in the Energy Crisis: Impacts and Implications for Theory and Policy , 1977 .

[6]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms : theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings , 1998 .

[7]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  Henk Visscher,et al.  Barriers and opportunities for labels for highly energy-efficient houses , 2010 .

[9]  Tereza Stöckelová.  Immutable Mobiles Derailed: STS, Geopolitics, and Research Assessment , 2012 .

[10]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy , 2009 .

[11]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology , 1994 .

[12]  Yvonne Phillips,et al.  Landlords versus tenants: Information asymmetry and mismatched preferences for home energy efficiency , 2012 .

[13]  Lukas Weber,et al.  Some reflections on barriers to the efficient use of energy , 1997 .

[14]  Kah-Hin Chai,et al.  Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach—A conceptual framework , 2012 .

[15]  Lawrence Busch,et al.  Standards: Recipes for Reality , 2011 .

[16]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  Passive houses in Austria: the role of intermediary organisations for the successful transformation of a socio-technical system , 2009 .

[17]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[18]  Meinolf Dierkes,et al.  AGAINST LINEARITY—ON THE CULTURAL APPROPRIATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY* , 2005 .

[19]  J. Taylor.  Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries , 2004 .