The swinging role of visualization in strategic planning

Embracing a practice-based approach to strategy and building on existing research on visual artefacts, this paper addresses the role of visualization in the processes of collective strategizing, which characterizes pluralistic settings. Specifically, it explores what happens when strategy mapping (a form of visual technique, sometimes employed in strategy making) is introduced in the strategic planning process of a public university. Building on the results of an inductive case study about the construction of a strategic plan in an Italian university, the paper shows that strategy mapping is a process able to take up different roles in different moments and performing three actions on knowledge in the accomplishment of strategy formation: formalizing, generating and bridging distributed knowledge. The paper thus unveils the swinging role that strategy mapping can have if it is conceived as a process which moves from closure to openness moments. In other words, our empirical insights contribute to shed some new light on the multiple (swinging) roles that visualization plays in ensuing moments of the strategizing process in pluralistic organizations, especially when the forging of collective knowledge about strategic direction is needed.

[1]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Strategizing through playful design , 2007 .

[2]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Visualizing Knowledge in Project-Based Work , 2008 .

[3]  Tahir Hameed,et al.  Reconciling ambiguity with interaction: implementing formal knowledge strategies in a knowledge-intensive organization , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  A. Langley,et al.  The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations , 2001 .

[5]  Robert Chia,et al.  Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice , 2007 .

[6]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  A mapping framework for strategy making , 2002 .

[7]  David Seidl,et al.  The Layered Materiality of Strategizing: Epistemic Objects and the Interplay between Material Artefacts in the Exploration of Strategic Topics , 2015 .

[8]  Cristiano Busco,et al.  In Search of the “Perfect One”: How accounting as a maieutic machine sustains inventions through generative ‘ in -tensions’ , 2017, Management Accounting Research.

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Temporal Work in Strategy Making , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames , 2007 .

[11]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visual Strategizing: The Systematic Use of Visualization in the Strategic-Planning Process , 2009 .

[12]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking during Strategic Change in Academia. , 1996 .

[13]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity , 1996 .

[14]  R. Whittington,et al.  Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously , 2012 .

[15]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The Material and Visual Turn in Organization Theory: Objectifying and (Re)acting to Novel Ideas , 2018 .

[16]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Strategy as Practice , 1996 .

[17]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  Strategy, Discourse and Practice: The Intensification of Power , 2014 .

[18]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[19]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[20]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy. , 1985 .

[21]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use , 2004 .

[22]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[23]  Hans-Jrg Rheinberger,et al.  A Reply to David Bloor: Toward a Sociology of Epistemic Things , 2005, Perspectives on Science.

[24]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[25]  Consuelo Vásquez,et al.  Materiality and Organizing , 2017 .

[26]  Cristiano Busco,et al.  Exploring how the balanced scorecard engages and unfolds , 2014 .

[27]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[28]  Rainer Lueg,et al.  Strategy maps: the essential link between the balanced scorecard and action , 2015 .

[29]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Material artifacts:practices for doing strategy with 'stuff' , 2013 .

[30]  P. Carlile.  How matter matters : objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies , 2013 .

[31]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts , 2006 .

[33]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Why I think shadowing is the best field technique in management and organization studies , 2014 .

[34]  Alice Comi,et al.  Future Making and Visual Artefacts: An Ethnographic Study of a Design Project , 2018 .

[35]  Jane Davison.  Visual Rhetoric and the Case of Intellectual Capital , 2013 .

[36]  J. Whyte,et al.  Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `Epistemic Objects' , 2009 .

[37]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[38]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[39]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Cristiano Busco,et al.  Performing business and social innovation through accounting inscriptions: An introduction , 2018 .

[41]  A. V. D. Ven.  SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1992 .

[42]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice , 2015 .

[43]  Denise Jarratt,et al.  How are Methodologies and Tools Framing Managers' Strategizing Practice in Competitive Strategy Development? , 2010 .

[44]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[45]  Pietro Micheli,et al.  Scenario-based strategy maps , 2010 .

[46]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[47]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategic planning as communicative process , 2011 .

[48]  C. Cuccurullo,et al.  Effective strategizing practices in pluralistic settings: the case of Academic Medical Centers , 2013 .

[49]  Curtis LeBaron,et al.  Materializing Strategy and Strategizing Materials: Why Matter Matters , 2015 .

[50]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Process studies of change in organization and management : unveiling temporality, activity, and flow , 2013 .

[51]  H. Rheinberger.  Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[52]  M. Giraudeau.  The Drafts of Strategy: Opening up Plans and their Uses , 2008 .

[53]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World , 2013 .

[54]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making , 2011, Organ. Sci..