Metropolitan Planning Objectives and Implementation Constraints: Planning in a Post-Fordist and Postmodern Age

Planning faces the predicament that as recommendations become bolder possibilities for implementation deteriorate. This is imputed to society's transition from a Fordist and modern to a post-Fordist and postmodern era. On the one hand, postmodern values account for more public participation and heightened environmental sensitivity, which translate into proposals for alternative forms of urban development. On the other hand, the implementation of these proposals is impaired by reduced public sector resources as a result of the economic instablity associated with post-Fordism. Another impediment is the difficulty to achieve sufficient support for planning objectives in the postmodern context. This context is marked by a fragmentation of values, attachment to the existing built environment, and suspicion between social groups. The empirical focus is on Toronto's bold metropolitan planning proposals. Most recent planning documents call for reurbanization efforts, a compact urban form, and reduced reliance on the car. In this paper I cast doubts, however, on the eventual actualization of these proposals by highlighting weaknesses in the of present and anticipated implementation context. These are tied to factors that are specific to Toronto, but also to a greater extent to the post-Fordist and postmodern environment.

[1]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  The New Social Economy: Reworking the Division of Labor , 1991 .

[2]  David Harvey,et al.  Flexible Accumulation through Urbanization Reflections on "Post-Modernism" in the American City , 1990 .

[3]  S Taylor,et al.  After the planners. , 1970, Physiotherapy.

[4]  R. Florida,et al.  Housing in US Fordism , 1988 .

[5]  M Gravel,et al.  THE ROLE OF TRANSIT IN THE SUBDIVISION DESIGN AND APPROVAL PROCESS , 1990 .

[6]  A. Scott Flexible production systems and regional development: the rise of new industrial spaces in North America and western Europe* , 1988 .

[7]  Adam Tickell,et al.  Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-Fordism: missing links in regulationist research , 1992 .

[8]  Mark E. Hanson,et al.  Automobile Subsidies and Land Use: Estimates and Policy Responses , 1992 .

[9]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global Survey , 1989 .

[10]  Erica Schoenberger,et al.  From Fordism to Flexible Accumulation: Technology, Competitive Strategies, and International Location , 1988 .

[11]  David Harvey,et al.  FLEXIBLE ACCUMULATION THROUGH URBANIZATION: REFLECTIONS ON ‘POST‐MODERNISM’ IN THE AMERICAN CITY , 1987 .

[12]  Robert A. Beauregard,et al.  Between Modernity and Postmodernity: The Ambiguous Position of US Planning , 1989 .

[13]  A. Lagopoulos,et al.  Postmodernism, Geography, and the Social Semiotics of Space , 1993 .

[14]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social structures of accumulation: The global economy: new edifice or crumbling foundations? , 1994 .

[15]  J. Sewell The Shape of the City: Toronto Struggles with Modern Planning , 1993 .

[16]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Flexible Integration, Scope Economies, and Strategic Alliances: Social and Spatial Mediations , 1988 .

[17]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Is there a Postmodern Sociology? , 1988 .

[18]  L. Bourne The Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography Recycling Urban Systems and Metropolitan Areas: A Geographical Agenda for the 1990s and beyond , 1991 .

[19]  Michael Dear,et al.  Postmodernism and Planning , 1986 .

[20]  P. Cooke Modern Urban Theory in Question , 1990 .

[21]  R. Boyer,et al.  The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction , 1990 .

[22]  L. Bourne,et al.  Self-Fulfilling Prophecies?: Decentralization, Inner City Decline, and the Quality of Urban Life , 1992 .

[23]  F. Jameson,et al.  Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism , 1992 .

[24]  P. Knox The Restless Urban Landscape: Economic and Sociocultural Change and the Transformation of Metropolitan Washington, DC , 1991 .

[25]  S. Clarke Overaccumulation, class struggle and the regulation approach , 1988 .

[26]  D. Harvey The urbanization of capital , 1985 .

[27]  J. MacLaughlin Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory , 1994 .

[28]  E. Soja,et al.  Urban Restructuring: An Analysis of Social and Spatial Change in Los Angeles , 1983 .

[29]  Mark D. Gottdiener The Decline of Urban Politics: Political Theory and the Crisis of the Local State , 1987 .

[30]  M. Webber,et al.  The Contemporary Transition , 1991 .

[31]  Barry Goodchild,et al.  Planning and the modern/postmodern debate , 1990 .

[32]  A. Scott,et al.  Metropolis: From the Division of Labor to Urban Form , 1988 .

[33]  B. Jessop Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect. , 1990 .

[34]  M. Dunford,et al.  Theories of Regulation , 1990 .

[35]  Alison Ravetz,et al.  Remaking Cities : Contradictions of the Recent Urban Environment , 1980 .