Cause-Effect Relationships in Analytical Surveys: An Illustration of Statistical Issues

Establishing cause-effect is critical in the field of natural resources where one may want to know the impact of management practices, wildfires, drought, etc. on water quality and quantity, wildlife, growth and survival of desirable trees for timber production, etc. Yet, key obstacles exist when trying to establish cause-effect in such contexts. Issues involved with identifying a causal hypothesis, and conditions needed to estimate a causal effect or to establish cause-effect are considered. Ideally one conducts an experiment and follows with a survey, or vice versa. In an experiment, the population of inference may be quite limited and in surveys, the probability distribution of treatment assignments is generally unknown and, if not accounted for, can cause serious errors when estimating causal effects. The latter is illustrated in simulation experiments of artificially generated forest populations using annual plot mortality as the response, drought as the cause, and age as a covariate that is correlated with mortality. We also consider the role of a vague unobservable covariate such as `drought susceptibility'. Recommendations are made designed to maximize the possibility of identifying cause-effect relationships in large-scale natural resources surveys.

[1]  R. Sugden,et al.  Sampling and Assignment Mechanisms in Experiments, Surveys and Observational , 1988 .

[2]  D B Rubin,et al.  Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism. , 1991, Biometrics.

[3]  Frederic M. Lord,et al.  Equating test scores—A maximum likelihood solution , 1955 .

[4]  W. Bechtold,et al.  Changing Stand Structure and Regional Growth Reductions in Georgia's Natural Pine Stands , 1991 .

[5]  D. Rubin INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[6]  Anthony R. Olsen,et al.  Perspectives on large-scale natural resource surveys when cause-effect is a potential issue , 1997, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[7]  E. Schulze,et al.  Air Pollution and Forest Decline in a Spruce (Picea abies) Forest , 1989, Science.

[8]  H. Iyer,et al.  Unit–Treatment Interaction and Its Practical Consequences , 2000, Biometrics.

[9]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  Pine growth reductions in the Southeast , 1985 .

[10]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Data Analysis and Regression , 1978 .

[11]  Michail Prodan,et al.  CHAPTER 17 – THE PLANNING OF EXPERIMENTS , 1968 .

[12]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Formal modes of statistical inference for causal effects , 1990 .

[13]  D. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[14]  D. Cox THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EFFECTS OF NON-ADDITIVITY IN THE LATIN SQUARE , 1958 .

[15]  H. T. Schreuder,et al.  Establishing Cause-Effect Relationships Using Forest Survey Data , 1991, Forest Science.

[16]  J M Lachin,et al.  Statistical properties of randomization in clinical trials. , 1988, Controlled clinical trials.

[17]  D. Cox Causality : some statistical aspects , 1992 .

[18]  Mark Peifer,et al.  β-Catenin as Oncogene--The Smoking Gun , 1997, Science.

[19]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. , 1988, Science.

[20]  C. Glymour Statistics and Causal Inference: Comment: Statistics and Metaphysics , 1986 .

[21]  P. Rosenbaum From Association to Causation in Observational Studies: The Role of Tests of Strongly Ignorable Treatment Assignment , 1984 .

[22]  P. Holland Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[23]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Data Analysis and Regression , 1978 .