Reading Skill, Textbook Marking, and Course Performance

We surveyed students enrolled in Introductory Psychology courses about their text marking preferences and analyzed the marking in their textbooks. Low-skill readers report more reliance on highlighting strategies and actually mark their texts more than better readers. In addition, low-skilled readers prefer to buy used, previously marked texts over new ones! Furthermore, when low-skill readers mark their texts, they are less capable of marking the most relevant material as determined by instructors asked to mark sampled text pages for comparison. All of this adds up to a destructive feedback system in which students who are weak readers can make things even worse in terms of course performance due to their text marking preferences and behaviors.

[1]  W. Hershberger.  Self-evaluational responding and typographical cueing: Techniques for programing self-instructional reading materials. , 1964 .

[2]  James Hartley,et al.  Underlining Can Make a Difference—Sometimes , 1980 .

[3]  Valjean M. Cashen,et al.  Role of the Isolation Effect in a Formal Educational Setting. , 1970 .

[4]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[5]  P. Broek,et al.  The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[6]  David S. Kreiner,et al.  The effects of pre‐existing inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension , 1997 .

[7]  Harry Singer,et al.  Reading and learning from text , 1980 .

[8]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Underlining versus repetitive reading. , 1972 .

[9]  Darwin Johnson,et al.  Effects of correct and extraneous markings under time limits on reading comprehension , 1976 .

[10]  Linda F. Annis,et al.  Studying Techniques--Comparing Their Effectiveness. , 1978 .

[11]  Peter R. Denner,et al.  Depressive effects of underlining and adjunct questions on children's recall of text , 1979 .

[12]  R. Fowler,et al.  Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material. , 1974 .

[13]  Gerald J. August,et al.  Generative underlining strategies in prose recall. , 1975 .

[14]  Sherrie L. Nist,et al.  The Role of Underlining and Annotating in Remembering Textual Information. , 1987 .

[15]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Situation-Based Context and the Availability of Predictive Inferences , 2001 .

[16]  S. Kontos.  Development and Interrelationships of Reading Knowledge and Skills during Kindergarten and First Grade. , 1988 .

[17]  W. Hershberger,et al.  TYPOGRAPHICAL CUING IN CONVENTIONAL AND PROGRAMED TEXTS. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  David M. Memory.  Main Idea Prequestions as Adjunct Aids with Good and Low-Average Middle Grade Readers , 1983 .

[19]  Sandra S. Smiley,et al.  Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation , 1977 .

[20]  B. Meyer.  Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[21]  Peter N. Winograd.  Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts , 1984 .

[22]  Daniel P. Murphy,et al.  The Validity of the Nelson-Denny Reading Test as a Predictor of Performance in Introductory Psychology , 1980 .

[23]  Peter W. Hoon.  Efficacy of Three Common Study Methods , 1974 .

[24]  James I. Brown.  The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. , 1960 .

[25]  Sarah E. Peterson,et al.  The cognitive functions of underlining as a study technique , 1991 .

[26]  Beverly Bartel.  What Research Has to Say about Instruction in Text-Marking Strategies. , 1994 .

[27]  L. L. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Underlining Textbook Sentences on Passage and Sentence Retention. , 1988 .

[28]  K. Lonka,et al.  The effect of study strategies on learning from text , 1994 .

[29]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Topic Structure Representation and Text Recall. , 1985 .