A Peer-to-Peer Application System for Scholarly Communication

The number of scientific journals and thereby the number of published articles grew with an enormous rate in the last century (e.g. Price 1986; Henderson 2002). In the second half of the 20 century the system seemed to abut against its boundaries, because in relation to research budgets, library budgets did not grow fast enough to cover all the scientific output produced. Price increases well above the inflation rate set by commercial publishers that bundle disproportionately high market power – especially for journals in the Science-Technical-Medicine-Sector in the last thirty years – intensified the situation even further. This situation is known as the serial crisis. New Information and Communication Technology (ICT) driven publication models are established and seem to be a promising way out of the crisis because they reduce distribution costs significantly. Especially the open access (OA) movement that advocates free electronic access to scientific output is subject to a fierce public debate. In this paper we will detail problems associated with OA and suggest a Peer-toPeer (P2P) system that supports electronic scholarly communication as a tool to address the economic problems mentioned above.

[1]  Susan Hahn,et al.  Faculty Perceptions of Electronic Journals as Scholarly Communication: A Question of Prestige and Legitimacy , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Christopher M. Snyder,et al.  Open Access and Academic Journal Quality , 2005 .

[3]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Using and Reading Scholarly Literature. , 1999 .

[4]  Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason,et al.  Competition Between Firms that Bundle Information Goods , 1999 .

[5]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Lessons for the future of journals , 2001, Nature.

[6]  Isidore Silver.  Big chill, big deal , 1984 .

[7]  M. McCabe.  Law Serials Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach , 2004 .

[8]  Mark J. McCabe,et al.  The Impact of Publisher Mergers on Journal Prices , 2001 .

[9]  Theresa Velden,et al.  The eDoc-Server Project – building an institutional repository for the Max Planck Society , 2004 .

[10]  David R. Karger,et al.  Building peer-to-peer systems with chord, a distributed lookup service , 2001, Proceedings Eighth Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems.

[11]  Diann Rusch-Feja,et al.  Evaluation of Usage and Acceptance of Electronic Journals: Results of an Electronic Survey of Max Planck Society Researchers including Usage Statistics from Elsevier, Springer, and Academic Press , 1999, D Lib Mag..

[12]  Raym Crow,et al.  The case for institutional repositories : a SPARC position paper , 2002 .

[13]  Paul E. van der Vet,et al.  Developments in scientific communication: Considerations on the value chain , 2001 .

[14]  Don Schauder.  Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry , 1994 .

[15]  Don Schauder,et al.  Electronic Publishing of Professional Articles: Attitudes of Academics and Implications for the Scholarly Communication Industry , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Jean-Claude Guedon,et al.  The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching , 2004 .

[17]  Nicholas R Cozzarelli.  An open access option for PNAS. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Marja-Riitta Koivunen,et al.  Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared Web annotations , 2001, WWW '01.

[19]  Carl Cornell.  Bridging the Past and Future : Scholarly Communication in the 21 st Century , 2004 .

[20]  Martin Frank,et al.  A Not-for-Profit Publisher's Perspective on Open Access , 2004 .

[21]  Robert Morris,et al.  Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications , 2001, SIGCOMM 2001.

[22]  Pieter Bolman.  Open Access: Marginal or core phenomenon? A commercial publisher's view , 2003 .

[23]  David R. Karger,et al.  Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications , 2001, SIGCOMM '01.

[24]  M. McCabe.  Journal Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach , 2002 .

[25]  Christopher M. Snyder,et al.  The Economics of Open-Access Journals , 2004 .

[26]  Domenico Menicucci,et al.  Bundling Electronic Journals and Competition Among Publishers , 2003 .

[27]  Alma Swan,et al.  ‘WHAT AUTHORS WANT’: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals , 1999, Learn. Publ..

[28]  Richard E. Abel,et al.  Scholarly Publishing: Books, Journals, Publishers, and Libraries in the Twentieth Century , 2001 .

[29]  Vicky Reich,et al.  Permanent Web Publishing , 2000, USENIX Annual Technical Conference, FREENIX Track.

[30]  Alma Swan,et al.  Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology , 2003, Learn. Publ..

[31]  Cheri Speier,et al.  Faculty Perceptions of Electronic Journals as Scholarly Communication: A Question of Prestige and Legitimacy , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Vicky Reich,et al.  LOCKSS: A Permanent Web Publishing and Access System , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[33]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? , 2004, Learn. Publ..

[34]  Les Carr,et al.  The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .

[35]  Alastair Dryburgh.  Open‐access journals — nice idea, shame about the numbers? , 2003, Learn. Publ..

[36]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Little science, big science... and beyond , 1994, Scientometrics.

[37]  Michael Miller,et al.  Discovering P2P , 2001 .

[38]  Owen R. Phillips,et al.  The market for academic journals , 2002 .