Selecting information to answer questions: Strategic individual differences when searching texts

The purpose of the study was to explore students’ selection of information strategies in a task-oriented reading situation. 72 secondary school students read two texts and answered six questions per text, three of which were manipulated to induce a misleading matching between the wording of the question and distracting pieces of information in the text. The reading and question-answering were presented with the software Read&Answer. We analyzed how skilled and less-skilled comprehenders were attracted to the distracting pieces of information and how this affected reading patterns and task outcomes. Skilled comprehenders scored higher and were able to discard the distracting information. In contrast, less-skilled comprehenders copied and processed this information in more detail. On-line data provided evidence for these behaviors. These results suggest that skilled comprehension facilitates the use of idea-based selection of information strategies, whereas less-skilled comprehension induces the inappropriate use of word-matching selection of information strategies.

[1]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Why Are Poor Comprehenders Inefficient Searchers? An Investigation into the Effects of Text Representation and Spatial Memory on the Ability To Locate Information in Text. , 2000 .

[2]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Jérôme Dinet,et al.  The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students' assessment of relevance in Web menus , 2011 .

[4]  Mabel A. b. Bessey,et al.  Reading for understanding , 1936 .

[5]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[6]  Matthew T. McCrudden,et al.  Relevance and Goal-Focusing in Text Processing , 2007 .

[7]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Estrategias de selección de información en tareas de contestación a preguntas , 2010 .

[8]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[9]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Impact of Question-Answering Tasks on Search Processes and Reading Comprehension. , 2009 .

[10]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Individual Differences for Self-Regulating Task-Oriented Reading Activities. , 2010 .

[11]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  The Effects of Tasks on Integrating Information From Multiple Documents , 2008 .

[12]  Francisco Szigriszt Pazos.  Sistemas predictivos de legilibilidad del mensaje escrito: fórmula de perspicuidad , 2012 .

[13]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[14]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Johanna K. Kaakinen,et al.  Individual Differences in Reading To Summarize Expository Text: Evidence from Eye Fixation Patterns. , 2002 .

[16]  Brenda Hannon,et al.  Shallow Semantic Processing of Text: An Individual-Differences Account , 2004 .

[17]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.