The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education

Abstract The extent to which teachers adopt technology in their teaching practice has long been in the focus of research. Indeed, a plethora of models exist explaining influential factors and mechanisms of technology use in classrooms, one of which—the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and versions thereof—has dominated the field. Although consensus exists about which factors in the TAM might predict teachers’ technology adoption, the current field abounds in some controversies and inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis seeks to clarify some of these issues by combining meta-analysis with structural equation modeling approaches. Specifically, we synthesized 124 correlation matrices from 114 empirical TAM studies (N = 34,357 teachers) and tested the fit of the TAM and its versions. Overall, the TAM explains technology acceptance well; yet, the role of certain key constructs and the importance of external variables contrast some existing beliefs about the TAM. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Assumptions in structural equation modeling. , 2012 .

[2]  Mike W-L Cheung,et al.  Random‐effects models for meta‐analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations , 2016, Research synthesis methods.

[3]  T. Little.  Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling , 2013 .

[4]  J. Fraillon,et al.  Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report , 2014 .

[5]  Md Athar Imtiaz,et al.  Analyzing trends in technology acceptance studies in education domain , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT).

[6]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Ronny Scherer,et al.  Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Conclusions from meta‐analytic structural equation models generally do not change due to corrections for study artifacts , 2011, Research synthesis methods.

[9]  Ozlem Baydas,et al.  A model for preservice teachers’ intentions to use ICT in future lessons† , 2017, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[10]  Mike W.-L. Cheung,et al.  Meta-Analysis: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 2015 .

[11]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[13]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Noel A. Card.  Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research , 2011 .

[15]  Francisco Buitrago Flórez,et al.  Changing a Generation’s Way of Thinking: Teaching Computational Thinking Through Programming , 2017 .

[16]  Wouter Duyck,et al.  Predicting secondary school teachers' acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Özkan Kirmizi,et al.  Measuring Technology Acceptance Level of Turkish Pre-Service English Teachers by Using Technology Acceptance Model. , 2014 .

[18]  M. Cheung,et al.  The Structure of Cognitive Vulnerabilities to Depression and Anxiety , 2014 .

[19]  Bryan Berrett,et al.  Administrator Insights and Reflections: Technology Integration in Schools , 2012 .

[20]  E. Straub.  Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning , 2009 .

[21]  Hamed Taherdoost,et al.  A Review of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models and Theories , 2023, International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research.

[22]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Comparing pre-service and in-service teachers' acceptance of technology: Assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[23]  M. Cheung.  Constructing Approximate Confidence Intervals for Parameters With Structural Equation Models , 2009 .

[24]  Mike W-L Cheung,et al.  Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[25]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Preservice English as a Foreign Language Teachers’ Acceptance of Computer-Assisted Language Learning 2.0 in the People’s Republic of China , 2018 .

[26]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers , 2007 .

[27]  Meltem Huri Baturay,et al.  The relationship among pre-service teachers' computer competence, attitude towards computer-assisted education, and intention of technology acceptance , 2017 .

[28]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  H. Marsh,et al.  In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .

[31]  Toni Downes,et al.  Teaching Teachers for the Future: How, What, Why, and What Next?. , 2012 .

[32]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Scale Reliability Using Latent Variable Modeling , 2013 .

[33]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[34]  V.J. Shute,et al.  Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education , 2017, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  Mike W-L Cheung,et al.  Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[36]  Jing Zhu,et al.  A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Mike W.-L. Cheung,et al.  Testing IB theories with meta-analytic structural equation modeling , 2016 .

[38]  Kristin Naragon-Gainey,et al.  The Structure of Common Emotion Regulation Strategies: A Meta-Analytic Examination , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Francesco Avvisati.  Students, computers and learning : making the connection , 2015 .

[40]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[42]  J. Michael Spector.  Cognition and learning in the digital age: Promising research and practice , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[44]  J. Sachs,et al.  Test of the Technology Acceptance Model for a Web-Based Information System in a Hong Kong Chinese Sample , 2006, Psychological reports.

[45]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Research Design Effects on the Reliability of Rating Scales: A Meta-Analysis: , 1984 .

[46]  Chyan Yang,et al.  International Journal of Information Management the Intellectual Development of the Technology Acceptance Model: a Co-citation Analysis , 2022 .

[47]  Alessandro Antonietti,et al.  Teachers' beliefs about learning from multimedia , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[49]  Nicola L. Ritter.  Technology acceptance model of online learning management systems in higher education: A meta-analytic structural equation model , 2017 .

[50]  Wen-Juo Lo,et al.  Investigating the Sensitivity of Goodness-of-Fit Indices to Detect Measurement Invariance in a Bifactor Model , 2015 .

[51]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[52]  Claudia Smarkola.  A Mixed-Methodological Technology Adoption Study , 2011 .

[53]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[54]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[55]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[56]  M. Kane.  Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores , 2013 .

[57]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[58]  J. Fraillon,et al.  Preparing for life in a digital age , 2014 .

[59]  Michal Beller,et al.  Technologies in Large-Scale Assessments: New Directions, Challenges, and Opportunities , 2013 .

[60]  Boris Magnusson,et al.  Technology integration , 1996, CSUR.

[61]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[62]  Nicolae Nistor,et al.  When technology acceptance models won't work: Non-significant intention-behavior effects , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[63]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  P-Curve: A Key to the File Drawer , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[64]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[65]  S. West,et al.  Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. , 2012 .

[66]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[68]  Judi Harris,et al.  What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2009 .

[69]  Ronny Scherer,et al.  The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Modelling the intention to use technology for teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers in Serbia , 2015 .

[71]  Lei Liu,et al.  Interdisciplinary research agenda in support of assessment of collaborative problem solving: lessons learned from developing a Collaborative Science Assessment Prototype , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[72]  Suzanne Jak,et al.  Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling , 2015 .

[73]  R. Olsen,et al.  Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy , 2016 .

[74]  Ronny Scherer,et al.  Revisiting teachers' computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[75]  Nicolae Nistor,et al.  Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM: An answer to Teo (2009a) , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[76]  Farrah Dina Yusop,et al.  A dataset of factors that influence preservice teachers' intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in future teaching practices , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[77]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  THE FILE‐DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL‐SAFE NUMBERS IN META‐ANALYSIS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[78]  Marjan Hericko,et al.  A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[80]  Liwei Hsu,et al.  Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: a partial least square approach , 2016 .

[81]  Ronny Scherer,et al.  Teachers' emphasis on developing students' digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[82]  M. Fishbein.  A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[83]  Nurazean Maarop,et al.  A Review of Technology Acceptance Studies in the Field of Education , 2014 .

[84]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[85]  Chang Soo Nam,et al.  Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Special Education Teachers: A Structural Equation Model Approach , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[86]  Ariel M. Aloe,et al.  Inaccuracy of regression results in replacing bivariate correlations , 2015, Research synthesis methods.

[87]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Investigating the Technology Acceptance among Student Teachers in Malaysia: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) , 2009 .

[88]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[89]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Understanding the Intention to Use Technology by Preservice Teachers: An Empirical Test of Competing Theoretical Models , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[90]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[91]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[92]  Vitaliy Mezhuyev,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[93]  R. Shroff,et al.  Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system , 2011 .

[94]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. , 2007 .

[95]  Wouter Duyck,et al.  Teachers' acceptance and use of an educational portal , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[96]  Andrina Granic,et al.  Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013 , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[97]  Rupert Ward,et al.  Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[98]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[99]  S. Wright.  The Method of Path Coefficients , 1934 .

[100]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Two Types of Attitudes in ICT Acceptance and Use , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[101]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework , 2014 .

[102]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..