Useful Uselessness?: Teaching Robots to Knit with Humans

This pictorial uses imagery of human-robot collaboration, or cobots, as a site to examine the potential of queer use within design research. Through close documentation of our process, we reflect on acts of teaching a commercially available robot to knit with us-a messy and seemingly unproductive process. However, this uselessness of the chosen task allows us to re-consider the idealization of robotic collaboration. We question the optimization of a largely human labor force and the associated drive to increase efficiency within a range of sectors, from the service industry to industrial production. Building on non-use literatures examining technological limits, and drawing on performative explorations and critique, we show how knitting enlarges our capacity to visualize what might be a suitable use case for cobots.

[1]  M. Brooke,et al.  What’s the use? , 2006, Neurology.

[2]  Tania Pérez-Bustos “Let Me Show You”: A Caring Ethnography of Embodied Knowledge in Weaving and Engineering , 2018 .

[3]  Sabine Pfeiffer Industry 4.0: Robotics and Contradictions , 2018 .

[4]  Morana Alaăź,et al.  Social robots: Things or agents? , 2016 .

[5]  Sadie Plant Zeros + ones : digital women + the new technoculture , 1997 .

[6]  J. Burrell Invisible Users: Youth in the Internet Cafés of Urban Ghana , 2012 .

[7]  Kimiko Ryokai,et al.  Being the Machine: Reconfiguring Agency and Control in Hybrid Fabrication , 2015, CHI.

[8]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Spyn: augmenting the creative and communicative potential of craft , 2010, CHI.

[9]  Jentery Sayers Making Things and Drawing Boundaries: Experiments in the Digital Humanities , 2018 .

[10]  P. Treusch Robotic Knitting , 2020 .

[11]  Morgan G. Ames Charismatic technology , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[12]  Pat Treusch,et al.  Robotic Companionship : The Making of Anthropomatic Kitchen Robots in Queer Feminist Technoscience Perspective , 2015 .

[13]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Making Core Memory: Design Inquiry into Gendered Legacies of Engineering and Craftwork , 2018, CHI.

[14]  Thomas Conner,et al.  Robot Rights , 2019, New Media Soc..

[15]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Subject objects , 2011 .

[16]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design , 2018 .

[17]  Morana Alac,et al.  Social robots: Things or agents? , 2015, AI & SOCIETY.

[18]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  When the implication is not to design (technology) , 2011, CHI.

[19]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Why study technology non-use? , 2015, First Monday.

[20]  Käthe von Bose,et al.  Keime, Zeitdruck und Roboter als ‚Helfer für alle‘: , 2019, Care: Praktiken und Politiken der Fürsorge.

[21]  James Pierce,et al.  Undesigning technology: considering the negation of design by design , 2012, CHI.

[22]  Sara Ahmed,et al.  What's the Use?: On the Uses of Use , 2019 .

[23]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Doing Things with Research through Design: With What, with Whom, and Towards What Ends? , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.