Can the published cost analysis data for delivery of an efficient primary angioplasty service be applied to the modern National Health Service?

Despite the clinical benefits and safety profile of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the health care system in the UK has been slow to adopt this strategy as first line management for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The cost implications of a 24 hour a day, seven days per week primary PCI service and the absence of an existing efficient working model within the National Health Service (NHS) framework are two of the major deterrents for provision of such a service. The existent cost effectiveness data for primary PCI is critically reviewed, with particular reference to the NHS.

[1]  G. Nichol,et al.  Hospitalization Costs of Primary Stenting Versus Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Cost Analysis of the Canadian STAT Study , 2003, Circulation.

[2]  Hobbs Fdr. The National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease , 2002 .

[3]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction , 2001, Heart.

[4]  W. Parmley Cost-effectiveness of reperfusion strategies. , 1999, American heart journal.

[5]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Costs of stenting for acute myocardial infarction , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Projected cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Analysis of the relative costs and effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus tissue-type plasminogen activator: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. The PAMI Trial Investigators. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  A cost-effective analysis of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  K. Bailey,et al.  Cost Comparison of Immediat Angioplasty Versus Thrombolysis Followed by Conservative Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Prospective Trial , 1994 .

[10]  K. Bailey,et al.  Cost comparison of immediate angioplasty versus thrombolysis followed by conservative therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized prospective trial. Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups. , 1994, Mayo Clinic proceedings.