Can the published cost analysis data for delivery of an efficient primary angioplasty service be applied to the modern National Health Service?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Nichol,et al. Hospitalization Costs of Primary Stenting Versus Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Cost Analysis of the Canadian STAT Study , 2003, Circulation.
[2] Hobbs Fdr.. The National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease , 2002 .
[3] J. Ottervanger,et al. Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction , 2001, Heart.
[4] W. Parmley. Cost-effectiveness of reperfusion strategies. , 1999, American heart journal.
[5] H. Suryapranata,et al. Costs of stenting for acute myocardial infarction , 1998, The Lancet.
[6] M. Weinstein,et al. Projected cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] J. O’Keefe,et al. Analysis of the relative costs and effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus tissue-type plasminogen activator: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. The PAMI Trial Investigators. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] H. Suryapranata,et al. A cost-effective analysis of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.
[9] K. Bailey,et al. Cost Comparison of Immediat Angioplasty Versus Thrombolysis Followed by Conservative Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Prospective Trial , 1994 .
[10] K. Bailey,et al. Cost comparison of immediate angioplasty versus thrombolysis followed by conservative therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized prospective trial. Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups. , 1994, Mayo Clinic proceedings.