The determinants of research group performance: Towards Mode 2?

This paper explores the determinants of performance of research groups in the context of the emergence of knowledge as a key intangible asset. It focuses specifically on how best to configure knowledge producers for optimal effectiveness in the current research environment. It explores the under-researched area of the organization and management of research groups located in and at the interface of university research and focuses on medical and medical-related research groups. The discussion is embedded within the current debate concerning modes of organization in knowledge production. Factors identified with high-achievement are: strong leadership; finding, motivating and retaining talent; strategies of related diversification; strongly linked theory and practice and, in particular, network connectedness. Such groups exhibit an increasingly complex internal environment, facilitating a flexible response to an increasingly complex external environment. It finds evidence of Mode 2 working, with increasing use of collaborative strategies and some evidence of a thematic emphasis emerging, although to a lesser extent than the literature suggests, since participants are still working from a strongly disciplinary base. Driven by the more competitive environment, both intellectual and commercial forms of entrepreneurship are present. At the hub of this complex web of inter-related factors is network connectedness, which proves to be centrally facilitative in mobilizing the other necessary resources.

[1]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[2]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[3]  Isabelle Bouty.  Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[4]  David Knights,et al.  The Hype and Hope of Interdisciplinary Management Studies , 1997 .

[5]  Laurie Cohen,et al.  The Meaning Professionals Give to Management... and Strategy , 2000 .

[6]  D. Tranfield,et al.  The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy , 1998 .

[7]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners , 1995 .

[8]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[9]  H. Etzkowitz.  Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[10]  John Child,et al.  THE CONTEXT AND PROCESS OF ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION ‐ CADBURY LIMITED IN ITS SECTOR , 1987 .

[11]  Dan Holtshouse.  Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[12]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[13]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[14]  John Ziman,et al.  Academic Science as a System of Markets , 1991 .

[15]  Jean E. Wallace.  Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations , 1995 .

[16]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[17]  Laurie Cohen,et al.  Fueling Discovery or Monitoring Productivity: Research Scientists' Changing Perceptions of Management , 1999 .

[18]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .

[19]  H. Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions , 1999 .

[20]  A. Grandori,et al.  Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms , 1995 .

[21]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[22]  Deborah Cox,et al.  Men in White Coats?.Men in Grey Suits: new public management and the funding of scientific research in the UK , 1998 .

[23]  Henry. Wasser,et al.  Changes in the European University: From Traditional to Entrepreneurial , 1990 .

[24]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[25]  Judith R. Blau,et al.  Ideas, Complexity, and Innovation. , 1979 .

[26]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Climate Formation: Issues and Extensions , 1985 .

[27]  D. Teece.  ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[28]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[29]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Cross-Cultural Collaborative Research: Toward Reflexivity , 1999 .

[30]  David,et al.  The 1996 Research Assessment Exercise for Business and Management , 1998 .

[31]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  Complex Social Organization: Multiple Organizing Modes, Structural Incongruence, and Mechanisms of Integration , 1998 .

[32]  Mark C. Butler,et al.  Toward a Theory of Comparative Management Research: An Idiographic Case Study of The Best International Human Resources Management Project , 1995 .