Embodied concept mapping: Blending structure-mapping and embodiment theories

Abstract Metaphors are cognitive and linguistic tools that allow reasoning. They enable the understanding of abstract domains via elements borrowed from concrete ones. The underlying mechanism in metaphorical mapping is the manipulation of concepts. This article proposes another view on what concepts are and their role in metaphor and reasoning. That is, based on current neuroscientific and behavioural evidence, it is argued that concepts are grounded in perceptual and motor experience with physical and social environments. This definition of concepts is then embedded in the Structure-Mapping Theory (SMT), a model for metaphorical processing and reasoning. The blended view of structure-mapping and embodied cognition offers an insight into the processes through which the target domain of a metaphor is embodied or realised in terms of its base domain. The implications of the proposed embodied SMT model are then discussed and future topics of investigation are outlined.

[1]  Dermot Lynott,et al.  Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability , 2012, Cognition.

[2]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  The shapes associated with approach/avoidance words , 2016 .

[3]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Los Secretos de Cien Años de Soledad: Una Aproximación Estilométrica para la Investigación en Psicolingüística , 2016 .

[5]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Symbol grounding problem , 1990, Scholarpedia.

[6]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Language Evolution: A Changing Perspective , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  A. Majid,et al.  How thought is mapped into words. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[8]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication , 2002 .

[9]  Jay G. Rueckl,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: How Does the Brain Read Words? , 2012 .

[10]  G. Lakoff.  Mapping the brain's metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  On Metaphor and Blending , 2009 .

[12]  A. Borghi.  Grounding Cognition: Object Concepts and Action , 2005 .

[13]  J. Feldman,et al.  Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language , 2004, Brain and Language.

[14]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context-Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Lives without imagery – Congenital aphantasia , 2015, Cortex.

[17]  D. Gentner.  Metaphor as Structure Mapping: The Relational Shift. , 1988 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Embodied neurology: an integrative framework for neurological disorders , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Text comprehension as a problem solving situation , 2014 .

[20]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  R. Carston.  Thoughts and Utterances , 2002 .

[22]  L. Tyler,et al.  Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.

[24]  R. Gibbs.  The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor , 2013 .

[25]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  NUEVOS AVANCES EN EL ESTUDIO CIENTÍFICO DE LA COMPRENSIÓN DE TEXTOS , 2007 .

[26]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Neural correlates of visualizations of concrete and abstract words in preschool children: a developmental embodied approach , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[27]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[28]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: The Human Conceptual System , 2012 .

[29]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[30]  N. Evans,et al.  With diversity in mind: Freeing the language sciences from Universal Grammar , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing , 2006, Science.

[32]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Pupillary Responses to Words That Convey a Sense of Brightness or Darkness , 2017, Psychological science.

[33]  Hassan Banaruee,et al.  The Role of Motion Concepts in Understanding Non-Motion Concepts , 2017, Behavioral sciences.

[34]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Implicit learning of mappings between forms and metaphorical meanings , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  The Neural Career of Sensory-motor Metaphors , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Sedigheh Vahdat,et al.  Abstract and concrete representations in structure-mapping and class-inclusion , 2015 .

[38]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[39]  M. McGlone,et al.  Topic—vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Randall Stilla,et al.  Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex , 2012, Brain and Language.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind , 2016, Synthese.

[42]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping in Metaphor Comprehension , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Peter C. Hansen,et al.  Functional neural correlates of fluid and crystallized analogizing , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  William G. Lycan,et al.  Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction , 1999 .

[45]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right , 2016, Psychometrika.

[46]  Alex Martin.  GRAPES—Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[47]  Herbert L. Colston,et al.  Interpreting Figurative Meaning , 2012 .

[48]  R. Gibbs.  Why many concepts are metaphorical , 1996, Cognition.

[49]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Placing joy, surprise and sadness in space: a cross-linguistic study , 2016, Psychological research.

[50]  Deirdre Wilson,et al.  Metaphor, relevance and the 'emergent property' issue , 2006 .

[51]  R. Giora.  Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[52]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Aptness in metaphor , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  Christoph D. Dahl,et al.  Conceptual metaphorical mapping in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2013, eLife.

[54]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The challenge of abstract concepts. , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Developing Categories and Concepts , 2012 .

[56]  D. Gentner,et al.  Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Supplementary Information for Natural Speech Reveals the Semantic Maps That Tile Human Cerebral Cortex , 2022 .

[58]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision , 2010, Cognitive Processing.

[59]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  The linguistic context effects on the processing of body–object interaction words: An ERP study on second language learners , 2015, Brain Research.

[60]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  J. Henrich,et al.  The weirdest people in the world? , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[62]  Pascale Tremblay,et al.  Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology , 2016, Brain and Language.

[63]  Jazmín Cevasco,et al.  The importance of studying prosody in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse , 2013 .

[64]  Anja Jamrozik,et al.  Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[65]  Mark Johnson,et al.  The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[66]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Metaphor and Thought: Metaphor, language, and thought , 1993 .

[67]  Olivier Gapenne,et al.  The co-constitution of the self and the world: action and proprioceptive coupling , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[68]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  Toward a Unified Sub-symbolic Computational Theory of Cognition , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[69]  D. Sperber,et al.  A deflationary account of metaphors , 2008 .

[70]  Chen-Bo Zhong,et al.  Cold and Lonely , 2008, Psychological science.

[71]  Marta Kutas,et al.  When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.

[72]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 2012 An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension : The influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands , 2016 .

[73]  S. Glucksberg.  The psycholinguistics of metaphor , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  Fernando Poyatos.  The multichannel reality of discourse: language-paralanguage-kinesics and the totality of communicative systems , 1984 .

[75]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Language and Thought Are Not the Same Thing: Evidence from Neuroimaging and Neurological Patients , 2022 .

[76]  M. Mehl,et al.  Natural language indicators of differential gene regulation in the human immune system , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Neural correlates of metaphor processing: The roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[78]  R. Cooper.  Process and Reality , 2014 .

[79]  A. Caramazza,et al.  For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[80]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[81]  R. Giora.  Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? , 2002 .

[82]  J. Prinz,et al.  A Bad Taste in the Mouth , 2011, Psychological science.

[83]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On Perceptual Metaphors , 1996 .

[84]  V. Gallese.  Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.