Comparing and Visualizing the Social Spreading of Products on a Large Social Network

By combining mobile traffic data and product adoption history from one of the markets of the telecom provider Telenor, we define and measure an adoption network—roughly, the social network among adopters. We study and compare the evolution of this adoption network over time for several products—the iPhone handset, the Doro handset, the iPad 3G and videotelephony. We show how the structure of the adoption network changes over time, and how it can be used to study the social effects of product diffusion. Specifically, we show that the evolution of the Largest Connected Component (LCC) and the size distribution of the other components vary strongly with different products. We also introduce simple tests for quantifying the social spreading effect by comparing actual product diffusion on the network to random based spreading models. As videotelephony is adopted pairwise, we suggest two types of tests: transactional- and node based adoption test. These tests indicate strong social network dependencies in adoption for all products except the Doro handset. People who talk together, are also likely to adopt together. Supporting this, we also find that adoption probability increases with the number of adopting friends for all the products in this study. We believe that the strongest spreading of adoption takes place in the dense core of the underlying network, and gives rise to a dominant LCC in the adoption network, which we call “the social network monster”. This is supported by measuring the eigenvector centrality of the adopters. We believe that the size of the monster is a good indicator for whether or not a product is going to “take off”.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Sougata Mukherjea,et al.  Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks , 2008, EDBT '08.

[3]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Marc Najork,et al.  A large‐scale study of the evolution of Web pages , 2004, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[5]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Rich Ling,et al.  Product Adoption Networks and Their Growth in a Large Mobile Phone Network , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[7]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[8]  Chris Volinsky,et al.  Network-Based Marketing: Identifying Likely Adopters Via Consumer Networks , 2006, math/0606278.

[9]  Christopher Olston,et al.  What's new on the web?: the evolution of the web from a search engine perspective , 2004, WWW '04.

[10]  Paul Erdös,et al.  On random graphs, I , 1959 .

[11]  Sougata Mukherjea,et al.  On the structural properties of massive telecom call graphs: findings and implications , 2006, CIKM '06.

[12]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations , 2005, KDD '05.

[13]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  On the Bursty Evolution of Blogspace , 2003, WWW '03.

[14]  G. Canright,et al.  Spreading on Networks: A Topographic View , 2006, Complexus.

[15]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of blogspace , 2004, CACM.

[16]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs: Notation , 2001 .

[18]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Jeho Lee,et al.  Role of network structure and network effects in diffusion of innovations , 2010 .

[20]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Mathematical results on scale‐free random graphs , 2005 .

[21]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.

[22]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[23]  Stefan Wuyts,et al.  Social Networks in Marketing , 2007 .

[24]  P. Bearman,et al.  Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[26]  G. Swann,et al.  Network effects and the choice of mobile phone operator , 2006 .

[27]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  Social Networks and Marketing , 2007 .

[28]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[29]  R. Richardson The International Congress of Mathematicians , 1932, Science.

[30]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW , 2004 .