Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one.

Research has consistently found nominal group brainstorming (in which members work separately without communicating) to be superior to brainstorming in which group members interact verbally. This article presents the results of an experiment that found the reverse to be true for computer-mediated electronic brainstorming. In this experiment, 12-member electronically interacting groups generated more ideas than did 12-member nominal groups, and there were no differences between 6-member electronic and 6-member nominal groups. The authors attribute these results to the ability of electronic brainstorming to introduce few process losses(production blocking, evaluation apprehension, and free riding) while enabling process gains (synergy and the avoidance of redundant ideas)

[1]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[3]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic Meeting Support: The GroupSystems Concept , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  The effect of group size and computer support on group idea generation for creativity tasks: an experimental evaluation using a repeated measures design , 1989 .

[5]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[6]  D. Hegedus,et al.  Task Effectiveness and Interaction Process of a Modified Nominal Group Technique in Solving an Evaluation Problem , 1986 .

[7]  Robert Albanese,et al.  Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency , 1985 .

[8]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[9]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[10]  G. W. Hill.  Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[11]  D. Madsen,et al.  Comparison of a written feedback procedure, group brainstorming, and individual brainstorming. , 1978 .

[12]  A. C. Lewis,et al.  The effectiveness of group brainstorming in engineering problem solving , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[14]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  Brainstorming procedure, group size, and sex as determinants of the problem-solving effectiveness of groups and individuals. , 1974 .

[15]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[16]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[17]  A. Delbecq,et al.  Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1971 .

[18]  J. Hackman,et al.  Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions , 1970 .

[19]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  J W O'Dell,et al.  Group size and emotional interaction. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  D. B. Devoe.  Alternatives to Handprinting in the Manual Entry of Data , 1967 .

[22]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .