Enhancing the Multifunctionality of US Agriculture

Multifunctional agriculture (MFA) enhances the quality and quantity of benefits provided by agriculture to society, by joint production of both agricultural commodities and a range of ecological services. In developed countries, new agroecosystem designs for MFA are appearing rapidly, but adoptions are limited. We present a heuristic strategy for increasing the adoption of MFA through development of new enterprises that enable farmers to profit from production of both agricultural commodities and ecological services. We propose that such enterprises can arise through feedback between social and biophysical systems operating across a range of scales. Such feedback depends on coordinated innovation among economic actors in a range of interdependent social sectors, supported by new “subsystems” that produce site-specific agroecological knowledge, and by change in the encompassing “supersystem” of public opinion and policy. This strategy can help guide efforts to increase the adoption of MFA.

[1]  C. Flora.  Shifting agroecosystems and communities. , 2001 .

[2]  Thomas A. Lyson,et al.  Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community , 2004 .

[3]  D. Andow,et al.  Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States , 2005 .

[4]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits , 2007 .

[5]  C. Hays,et al.  Potential production and environmental effects of switchgrass and traditional crops under current and greenhouse-altered climate in the central United States: a simulation study , 2000 .

[6]  P. Selman,et al.  On the nature of virtuous change in cultural landscapes: Exploring sustainability through qualitative models , 2006 .

[7]  E. Lambin,et al.  The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Establishing a Grass Energy Crop Market in the Decatur Area , 2007 .

[9]  Marion Nestle,et al.  Food Politics , 2002 .

[10]  M. Pollan.  Book Reviews , 2007 .

[11]  A. Thompson,et al.  Estimating soil erosion after 100 years of cropping on Sanborn Field , 1990 .

[12]  D. Currie,et al.  Human land use, agriculture, pesticides and losses of imperiled species , 2009 .

[13]  H. Friedmann.  Scaling up: Bringing public institutions and food service corporations into the project for a local, sustainable food system in Ontario , 2007 .

[14]  N. Castree,et al.  Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium , 1998 .

[15]  K. Warner.  Agroecology in Action: Extending Alternative Agriculture through Social Networks , 2006 .

[16]  Keith Douglass Warner,et al.  Agroecology as Participatory Science , 2008 .

[17]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Specifying “regime” — A framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research , 2008 .

[18]  S. Batie.  The Multifunctional Attributes of Northeastern Agriculture: A Research Agenda , 2003, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[19]  S. D. Merrill,et al.  Dynamic Cropping Systems: Increasing Adaptability Amid an Uncertain Future , 2007 .

[20]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture , 2007 .

[21]  Geoff A. Wilson,et al.  Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective , 2007 .

[22]  N. Argent,et al.  The Amenity Complex: Towards a Framework for Analysing and Predicting the Emergence of a Multifunctional Countryside in Australia , 2007 .

[23]  T. Dalgaard,et al.  Biomass energy in organic farming¿the potential role of short rotation coppice , 2005 .

[24]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources Management , 2004 .

[25]  Scott M. Swinton,et al.  Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture , 2005 .

[26]  P. Bogard.  The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals , 2007 .

[27]  J. Jiggins,et al.  Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice , 2007 .

[28]  G. Robertson,et al.  Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere , 2000, Science.

[29]  J. Kostel,et al.  Nutrient farming: The business of environmental management , 2005 .

[30]  F. Herzog,et al.  Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[31]  Christopher J. Kucharik,et al.  Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  U.S. Agriculture and Climate Change: New Results , 2003 .

[33]  D. Mulla,et al.  Influence of alternative and conventional farming practices on subsurface drainage and water quality. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[34]  Keith Douglass Warner,et al.  Sustainable Development of the Agricultural Bio-Economy , 2007, Science.

[35]  Nicholas R. Jordan.  Agroecology in Action–Extending Alternative Agriculture through Social Networks , 2008 .

[36]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[37]  Burghard Christian Meyer,et al.  Optimising rural land health: From landscape policy to community land use decision-making , 2008 .

[38]  Patricia Allen,et al.  Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: the tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California , 2003 .

[39]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Flux and Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin , 1999 .