The Influence of Initial Size on the Competitive Responses of Six Plant Species

Plant size may be an important determinant of competitive ability and may affect comparisons of competitive response among species. We examined the influence of initial size on plant competitive response in a field experiment using transplant in three classes of initial mass (class means: 27, 46, and 73 mg) for each of six species (Agropyron cristatum, Bouteloua gracilis, Elaeagnus commutata, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Melilotus officinalis, and Potentilla pensylvanica.) Transplant were grown for one summer in an old field dominated by the perennial grass Bromus inermis. The transplants were grown with no neighbors present, with shoots of neighbors present, with roots of neighbors present, or with both shoots and roots of neighbors present. The existing Bromus served as neighbors. There were 10 replicates of each factor combination. Final transplant mass varied significantly with competition, species identity, and initial size. The mass of transplant grown with only neighbor roots was not significantly different from the mass of transplants grown with both roots and shoots of neighbors, suggesting that competition in the field was primarily belowground. A significant interaction between species identity and competition indicated that species differed in the extent to which they were suppressed by neighbors. There was no significant interaction between size and competition, however, suggesting that initial size had no influence on competitive response. Further, regressions of final transplant mass against neighbor mass provided no evidence that initially smaller transplants were weaker competitors. Our results suggest that the competitive responses of the six species during the first summer of growth were not influenced by their initial size under conditions of intense belowground competition.

[1]  K. Gross Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants , 1984 .

[2]  Harold R. Lindman Analysis of Variance in Experimental Design , 1991 .

[3]  S. Wilson Competition and resource availability in heath and grassland in the Snowy Mountains of Australia , 1993 .

[4]  R. Reader,et al.  Variation in competition along an environmental gradient: Hieracium floribundum in an abandoned pasture , 1989 .

[5]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits , 1988, Nature.

[6]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  13 – Competitive Hierarchies and Centrifugal Organization in Plant Communities , 1990 .

[7]  D. Tilman,et al.  Component of Plant Competition Along an Experimental Gradient of Nitrogen Availability , 1991 .

[8]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Deborah E. Goldberg,et al.  NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION IN AN OLD-FIELD PLANT COMMUNITY' , 1987 .

[10]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Effect of nutrient level on competition intensity in the field for three coexisting grass species , 1991 .

[11]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[12]  William K. Lauenroth,et al.  PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND ABIOTIC CONTROLS IN FORESTS, GRASSLANDS, AND DESERT ECOSYSTEMS IN THE UNITED STATES' , 1983 .

[13]  J. Grace,et al.  Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. , 1990 .

[14]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size variability and competition in plant monocultures , 1986 .

[15]  J. Wilson,et al.  The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition , 1988 .

[16]  J. Black Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate , 1958 .

[17]  J. Gurevitch Competition and the Local Distribution of the Grass Stipa Neomexicana , 1986 .

[18]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[19]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Carbon Dynamics and Estimates of Primary Production by Harvest, ^(14)C Dilution, and ^(14)C Turnover , 1992 .

[20]  J. P. Grime,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN THREE PERENNIAL GRASSES , 1976 .

[21]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Predicting vegetation patterns from attributes of plant growth in grassland species , 1989 .

[22]  D. Tilman,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION AND RESOURCE AVAILABILITY IN RESPONSE TO DISTURBANCE AND FERTILIZATION , 1993 .

[23]  A. Winn Effects of seed size and microsite on seedling emergence of Prunella vulgaris in four habitats , 1985 .

[24]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[25]  T. Miller,et al.  Competitive Effects and Responses Between Plant Species in a First‐Year Old‐Field Community , 1987 .

[26]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations , 1986 .