Dependencies between E-Learning Usage Patterns and Learning Results

Recent studies come to the conclusion that Learning Management System (LMS) usage variables explain a higher variation in students' final grades than traditional student characteristics. Referring to such findings from literature our research aims at exploring dependencies between e-learning usage patterns and achieved learning results on the basis of LMS log-files from courses in different knowledge domains, and by analyzing courses not in isolation but by taking potential dependencies with students' activities in other courses into account. We examine correlations between usage variables and the students' performance in three blended learning courses with different topics based on large cohorts of students (n=883, n=389, n=578). In this context, an extended set of variables, including LMS usage beyond the three courses and usage patterns of students, are examined for interdependencies. Our results indicate that specific indicators, such as the number of active learning days and topic views, have a positive influence on learning results. In general, they show that at-risk students can be differentiated from well-performing students by their usage behavior. Moreover, we try to identify some significant patterns of LMS usage amongst the students. The paper shows how these patterns differ in our observations depending on the course domains.

[1]  Erik Duval,et al.  Learning Analytics Dashboard Applications , 2013 .

[2]  Gustaf Neumann,et al.  The Four Seasons: Identification of Seasonal Effects in LMS usage data , 2013 .

[3]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. , 2012 .

[4]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases , 1996, AI Mag..

[5]  B. Franklin,et al.  Educational Time Factors , 1989 .

[6]  Joseph D Hagman,et al.  Training Procedures for Enhancing Reserve Component Learning, Retention, and Transfer , 1989 .

[7]  M HERSTEIN,et al.  Let's talk! , 1956, The American journal of nursing.

[8]  Gustaf Neumann,et al.  The Learn@WU Learning Environment , 2003, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[9]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[10]  Edward Vul,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Spacing Effects in Learning A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention , 2022 .

[11]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  A reference model for learning analytics , 2012 .

[12]  Diana G. Oblinger Let's Talk... Analytics. , 2012 .

[13]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[14]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005 , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  John C. Whitmer,et al.  Logging On to Improve Achievement: Evaluating the Relationship between Use of the Learning Management System, Student Characteristics, and Academic Achievement in a Hybrid Large Enrollment Undergraduate Course , 2013 .

[16]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from Web data , 2000, SKDD.

[17]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Social Learning Analytics , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Open Learning Analytics: an integrated modularized platform , 2011 .

[19]  Haley A. Vlach,et al.  Distributing learning over time: the spacing effect in children's acquisition and generalization of science concepts. , 2012, Child development.