Assessing the dynamic foot mobility magnitude using an image-based analysis system

Numerous static measurement methods have been developed to aid with the clinical evaluation of the dynamic foot posture. Although some of these methods provided high measurement reliability and validity, there is limited research correlating the static measurements with the dynamic foot measurements during activities such as gait. To explore whether the Foot Mobility Magnitude (FMM) can be used to predict mid-foot posture during gait, static caliper measurements from two testers were compared with measurements obtained during gait using a photogrammetric measurement system utilising camcorders. The results obtained from the study showed that the photogrammetric measurement system provided slightly higher Intra-class rater reliability (0.951-0.992) results than the static caliper measurements (0.901-0.991). The Inter-rater reliability was found to be high between the testers (0.824-0.953) but only moderate between the photogrammetric measurements and manual measurements conducted by the testers (0.693-0.900). Results obtained from an ANOVA determined that there is a significant difference between the static and dynamic FMM measurements (p <; 0.05). It is hence concluded that to gain better insight into the dynamic behaviour of the foot, the use of video based measurement techniques is recommended.

[1]  Bill Vicenzino,et al.  Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test , 2008, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  B. Nigg,et al.  Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Albert K. Chong Exploiting HD Camcorders for Close-Up Human Movement Applications , 2012 .

[5]  H. Menz,et al.  Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[6]  Makiko Kouchi,et al.  Deformation of foot cross-section shapes during walking. , 2009, Gait & Posture.

[7]  Albert K. Chong,et al.  Reliability of a High Accuracy Image-Based System for 3D Modelling of the Medial Longitudinal Arch During Gait , 2013 .

[8]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait , 2009, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[9]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Measurement of 3D foot shape deformation in motion , 2008, PROCAMS '08.

[10]  D. Williams,et al.  Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[11]  Jack Crosbie,et al.  The effect of pes cavus on foot pain and plantar pressure. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Mohsen Razeghi,et al.  Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[14]  M. Cornwall,et al.  Relative Movement of the Navicular Bone During Normal Walking , 1999, Foot & ankle international.

[15]  Sandra J Shultz,et al.  Effects of Pronated and Supinated Foot Postures on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability. , 2005, Journal of athletic training.

[16]  W M Glasoe,et al.  Metrecom measurement of navicular drop in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament injury. , 2000, Journal of athletic training.

[17]  Bill Vicenzino,et al.  Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot , 2009, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[18]  W. Sanner,et al.  Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. , 1998, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[19]  Bill Vicenzino,et al.  Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio. , 2008, Foot.

[20]  Brody Dm,et al.  Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. , 1982 .