Model Order Selection in Reversible Image Watermarking

Digital watermarking is becoming increasingly important in a large number of applications such as copyright protection, content authentication, and document annotation. Thanks to its capability of exactly recovering the original host, reversible image watermarking, a kind of digital watermarking, is favored in fields sensitive to image quality like military and medical imaging. This paper presents theoretical examination and experimental analysis of model order selection in reversible image watermarking. It involves two modeling tools: prediction and context modeling. Classic prediction models are compared and evaluated using specially derived criteria for reversible image watermarking. Among them, the CALIC, a tool combining the Gradient-Adjusted Prediction with a context modeling, stands out as the best by providing the most competitive model-fitness with relatively low complexity. In addition, full context prediction, a model unique to reversible image watermarking, is also discussed. By exploiting redundancy to greater extent, it achieves highly fitted modeling at a very low order. Experimental results demonstrate that it is capable of providing even better performance than the CALIC with only negligible computation.

[1]  Xiao Zeng,et al.  Reversible data hiding using additive prediction-error expansion , 2009, MM&Sec '09.

[2]  B.G. Mobasseri,et al.  Digital video watermarking for metadata embedding in UAV video , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Image data compression: A review , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Yao Zhao,et al.  Lossless data hiding based on prediction-error adjustment , 2009, Science in China Series F: Information Sciences.

[5]  Xiao Zeng,et al.  Reversible image watermarking based on full context prediction , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[6]  R. Schafer,et al.  Two-dimensional linear prediction and its application to adaptive predictive coding of images , 1984 .

[7]  Chin-Chen Chang,et al.  Reversible data-embedding scheme using differences between original and predicted pixel values , 2008, IET Inf. Secur..

[8]  Xiaolin Wu,et al.  Piecewise 2D autoregression for predictive image coding , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[9]  Manohar Das,et al.  New studies on adaptive predictive coding of images using multiplicative autoregressive models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Recent Developments in Context-Based Predictive Techniques for Lossless Image Compression , 1997, Comput. J..

[11]  Yuan-Pei Lin,et al.  Adaptive lossless image coding using least squares optimization with edge-look-ahead , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[12]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Context-based, adaptive, lossless image coding , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[13]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  The LOCO-I lossless image compression algorithm: principles and standardization into JPEG-LS , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Michael T. Orchard,et al.  Edge directed prediction for lossless compression of natural images , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348).

[15]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[16]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Digital Watermarking and Steganography , 2014 .

[17]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  JPEG: Still Image Data Compression Standard , 1992 .

[18]  Yu-Chen Hu,et al.  Reversible image hiding scheme using predictive coding and histogram shifting , 2009, Signal Process..

[19]  Yongjian Hu,et al.  DE-Based Reversible Data Hiding With Improved Overflow Location Map , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[20]  Cedric Nishan Canagarajah,et al.  Rotationally invariant texture features using the dual-tree complex wavelet transform , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[21]  Masakatu Morii,et al.  Reversible Watermark with Large Capacity Based on the Prediction Error Expansion , 2008, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Invertible authentication , 2001, Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents.

[23]  Xiaolin Wu,et al.  Lossless compression of continuous-tone images via context selection, quantization, and modeling , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[24]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Lossless Data Embedding—New Paradigm in Digital Watermarking , 2002, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[25]  Jeffrey J. Rodríguez,et al.  Expansion Embedding Techniques for Reversible Watermarking , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Jorma Rissanen,et al.  Universal coding, information, prediction, and estimation , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[27]  Gadiel Seroussi,et al.  Sequential prediction and ranking in universal context modeling and data compression , 1997, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[28]  Jun Tian,et al.  Reversible data embedding using a difference expansion , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[29]  Nien-Lin Hsueh,et al.  A lossless data hiding scheme based on three-pixel block differences , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[30]  W. Kou,et al.  More compressible location map for reversible watermarking using expansion embedding , 2007 .