Virtual reality on the go?: a study on social acceptance of VR glasses

Virtual reality (VR) glasses enable to be present in an environment while the own physical body is located in another place. Recent mobile VR glasses enable users to be present in any environment they want at any time and physical place. Still, mobile VR glasses are rarely used. One explanation is that it is not considered socially acceptable to immerse in another environment in certain situations. We conducted an online experiment that investigates the social acceptance of VR glasses in six different contexts. Our results confirm that social acceptability depends on the situation. In the bed, in the metro, or in a train, mobile VR glasses seem to be acceptable. However, while being surrounded by other people where a social interaction between people is expected, such as in a living room or a public cafe, the acceptance of mobile VR glasses is significantly reduced. If one or two persons wear glasses seems to have a negligible effect. We conclude that social acceptability of VR glasses depends on the situation and is lower when the user is supposed to interact with surrounding people.

[1]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability , 2010, CHI.

[2]  Daniel Pohl,et al.  See what I see: Concepts to improve the social acceptance of HMDs , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[3]  Jan Gugenheimer Nomadic Virtual Reality: Exploring New Interaction Concepts for Mobile Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays , 2016, UIST.

[4]  Caroline Parker,et al.  An examination of the effects of a wearable display on informal face-to-face communication , 2006, CHI.

[5]  Shamsi T. Iqbal,et al.  Reducing disruption from subtle information delivery during a conversation: mode and bandwidth investigation , 2013, CHI.

[6]  Joo-Hwee Lim,et al.  Exploring users' attitudes towards social interaction assistance on Google Glass , 2015, AH.

[7]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Lifelogging: You're Wearing a Camera? , 2014, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[8]  Marion Koelle,et al.  Don't look at me that way!: Understanding User Attitudes Towards Data Glasses Usage , 2015, MobileHCI.

[9]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  Design probes study on user perceptions of a smart glasses concept , 2015, MUM.

[10]  Valentin Schwind On the Need for Standardized Methods to Study the Social Acceptability of Emerging Technologies , 2018 .

[11]  Halley Profita,et al.  The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use , 2016, CHI.

[12]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures , 2011, CHI.

[13]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[14]  Niels Henze,et al.  "These are not my hands!": Effect of Gender on the Perception of Avatar Hands in Virtual Reality , 2017, CHI.

[15]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  NotifEye: using interactive glasses to deal with notifications while walking in public , 2014, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[16]  Antti Jylhä,et al.  Designing a Willing-to-Use-in-Public Hand Gestural Interaction Technique for Smart Glasses , 2016, CHI.

[17]  Kouta Minamizawa,et al.  FrontFace: facilitating communication between HMD users and outsiders using front-facing-screen HMDs , 2017, MobileHCI.

[18]  Lisa Kleinman,et al.  Physically present, mentally absent: technology use in face-to-face meetings , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Mohamed Khamis,et al.  TransparentHMD: revealing the HMD user's face to bystanders , 2017, MUM.