Welded end‐slot connection and debonding layers for buckling‐restrained braces

SUMMARY The debonding mechanism has a significant effect on the performance of a buckling-restrained brace (BRB). In this paper, a method for estimating the compression strength adjustment factor for any given BRB core strain is presented. Experimental investigations were conducted on four BRBs to examine the efficiency of four different debonding materials in reducing the difference between the cyclic peak compression and tension. Test results indicate that chloroprene rubber is very easy to install and very effective in minimizing the difference between the compressive and tensile capacities. The excellent performance of 13 full-scale welded end-slot BRBs (WES-BRBs) is illustrated through experiments. Cyclic loading test results of a 12.5-m long jumbo WES-BRB reveal that its peak compressive strength exceeds 16,800 kN and its maximum core strain reaches 0.035. All WES-BRBs show satisfactory performance with a very stable hysteresis response, modest peak compressive to tensile strength ratio, and very predictable axial stiffness. These specimens sustain a cumulative plastic deformation of greater than 400 times the yield deformation. The hysteresis responses can be satisfactorily predicted by using a two-surface plasticity analytical model. Advantages of the welded end-slot connections are also presented through a discussion on the effects of the BRB yield region length ratio on the effective stiffness, the yield story drift, and the core strain level. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Qiang Xie,et al.  State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia , 2005 .

[2]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces , 2010 .

[3]  Toru Takeuchi,et al.  LOCAL BUCKLING RESTRAINT CONDITION FOR CORE PLATES IN BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES , 2010 .

[4]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic design and hybrid tests of a full‐scale three‐story buckling‐restrained braced frame using welded end connections and thin profile , 2012 .

[5]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Research and Application of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2004 .

[6]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Object-oriented development and application of a nonlinear structural analysis framework , 2009, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[7]  Cem Topkaya,et al.  An experimental study on steel‐encased buckling‐restrained brace hysteretic dampers , 2009 .

[8]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic design and test of gusset connections for buckling‐restrained braced frames , 2014 .

[9]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part II: Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained braces and connections , 2008 .

[10]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  High‐mode buckling responses of buckling‐restrained brace core plates , 2014 .

[11]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Earthquake response analyses of a full‐scale five‐story steel frame equipped with two types of dampers , 2013 .

[12]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic tests of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part I: Specimen design, experiment and analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Tsutomu Usami,et al.  Developing high‐performance aluminum alloy buckling‐restrained braces based on series of low‐cycle fatigue tests , 2012 .

[14]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  A model of nonlinearly hardening materials for complex loading , 1975 .

[15]  Ryota Matsui,et al.  Out‐of‐plane stability of buckling‐restrained braces including moment transfer capacity , 2014 .

[16]  Hanbin Ge,et al.  A seismic upgrading method for steel arch bridges using buckling‐restrained braces , 2005 .