Establishing quantitative indicators for measuring the partnering performance of construction projects in Hong Kong

Research into Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for partnering projects in construction becomes vital because an increasing trend of client organizations has been observed to introduce a partnering approach to their building and construction works internationally during the last decade. A Partnering Performance Index (PPI) has been developed for construction projects in Hong Kong. The PPI can assist in developing a benchmark for measuring the performance of their partnering projects. However, it is worth noting that assessors may have their own semantic interpretations on each KPI. The aim of this paper is to establish suitable quantitative indicators (QIs) and reasonable quantitative ranges (QRs) for each KPI in order to avoid any possible discrepancies in interpreting the meaning of each KPI and provide objective evaluation results based on quantitative evidence. By conducting five structured face‐to‐face interviews and two rounds of a Delphi questionnaire survey in Hong Kong, a set of QIs were developed to measure the seven most important KPIs, including: (1) time performance; (2) cost performance; (3) top management commitment performance; (4) quality performance; (5) trust and respect performance; (6) effective communications performance; and (7) innovation and improvement performance. The identified QIs and QRs could assess and compare different partnering projects on a common basis objectively, thus helping to set a benchmark for measuring the performance level of partnering projects in Hong Kong. Construction senior executives and project managers can thus apply the QIs and QRs to measure, evaluate and improve the existing performance of their partnering projects in order to strive for construction excellence.

[1]  Steve R. Sanders,et al.  PARTNERING PROCESS MODEL , 1997 .

[2]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques , 1994 .

[3]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Effective partnering tools in construction: a case study on MTRC TKE contract 604 in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[4]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance , 2003 .

[5]  Osama Abudayyeh.  Partnering: A Team Building Approach to Quality Construction Management , 1994 .

[6]  Susan McKay,et al.  The Art of Modeling Dynamic Systems: Forecasting for Chaos, Randomness and Determinism , 1991 .

[7]  N. Schwarz.  Cognition and Communication , 2004, Inner Worlds.

[8]  Apc Chan,et al.  An analysis of project partnering in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[9]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects , 2001 .

[10]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Using balanced scorecard (BSC) approach to measure performance of the partnering projects , 2006 .

[11]  Frederick D. Lazar,et al.  PARTNERING--NEW BENEFITS FROM PEERING INSIDE THE BLACK BOX , 1997 .

[12]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[13]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Expectation of performance levels pertinent to consultant performance evaluation , 2007 .

[14]  Marija J. Norusis,et al.  SPSS 16.0 Statistical Procedures Companion , 2003 .

[15]  M. Bresnen,et al.  Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances , 2000 .

[16]  Akintola Akintoye,et al.  An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction , 2000 .

[17]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study , 2007 .

[18]  Adrian Oldknow,et al.  Mathematics of models : continuous and discrete dynamical systems , 1993 .

[19]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An automated partnering monitoring system—Partnering Temperature Index , 2003 .

[20]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  DELPHI STUDY ON BRIDGE CONDITION RATING AND EFFECTS OF IMPROVEMENTS , 1991 .

[21]  Ross B. Corotis,et al.  Delphi Methods: Theory and Design Load Application , 1981 .

[22]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Partnering for construction excellence—A reality or myth? , 2006 .

[23]  Malik Beshir Malik,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005, Technometrics.

[24]  Ioannis E. Tsolas,et al.  Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: a Delphi study , 2006 .

[25]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[26]  Frederick D. Lazar,et al.  Project Partnering: Improving the Likelihood of Win/Win Outcomes , 2000 .

[27]  Steve R. Sanders,et al.  PEER-REVIEWED PAPER:Partnering Continuum , 1998 .

[28]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Co-operative benchmarking: a tool for partnering excellence in construction , 2001 .

[29]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[30]  S. Weisberg.  Applied Linear Regression: Weisberg/Applied Linear Regression 3e , 2005 .