Safety of disinvestment in mid- to late-term follow-up post primary hip and knee replacement: the UK SAFE evidence synthesis and recommendations
暂无分享,去创建一个
N. Arden | S. Kingsbury | P. Conaghan | A. Judge | K. Hill | Lindsay K Smith | C. Garriga | J. Matu | R. Pinedo-Villanueva | Chris Smith | C. C. Czoski Murray | F. Shuweihdi | J. Wright | R. West | Christine M Thomas | Spryos Kolovos | Byron KY Bitanihirwe | Martin Stone | M. Stone | L. Smith | Byron Bitanihirwe
[1] N. Arden,et al. UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national datasets tell us about mid–late term revision risk after knee replacement? , 2022, BMJ Open.
[2] N. Arden,et al. UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study , 2022, BMJ Open.
[3] M. Stone,et al. A comparative study of patients presenting for planned and unplanned revision hip or knee arthroplasty , 2022, The bone & joint journal.
[4] E. Lenguerrand,et al. Pilot study: Is a long‐term follow‐up service beneficial for patients undergoing revision hip replacement surgery? , 2020, Musculoskeletal care.
[5] H. Pandit,et al. Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture around total hip replacements: current concepts and clinical outcomes , 2020, EFORT open reviews.
[6] G. Babis,et al. Systematic review of primary total hip arthroplasty using titanium-titanium modular-neck prostheses: the true risk of revision , 2020, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.
[7] L. Lidgren,et al. Weight and height separated provide better understanding than BMI on the risk of revision after total knee arthroplasty: report of 107,228 primary total knee arthroplasties from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 2009–2017 , 2019, Acta orthopaedica.
[8] A. House,et al. Liaison psychiatry—measurement and evaluation of service types, referral patterns and outcomes (LP-MAESTRO): a protocol , 2019, BMJ Open.
[9] S. Kingsbury,et al. Developing a standardized approach to virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2019, The bone & joint journal.
[10] A. Beswick,et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness for long-term follow-up of total hip arthroplasty , 2019, Orthopedic research and reviews.
[11] D. Beverland,et al. Guidelines for the follow-up of total hip arthroplasty: do they need to be revised?. , 2019, The bone & joint journal.
[12] J. Wingham,et al. Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation , 2019, BMJ open quality.
[13] M. Stone,et al. Towards UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): protocol for an evaluation of the requirements for arthroplasty follow-up, and the production of consensus-based recommendations , 2017, BMJ Open.
[14] A. Benditz,et al. Revision Surgery in Total Joint Replacement Is Cost-Intensive , 2018, BioMed research international.
[15] Helen Strongman,et al. Approach to record linkage of primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink to other health-related patient data: overview and implications , 2018, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[16] P. Herberts,et al. Arthroplasty implant registries over the past five decades: Development, current, and future impact , 2018, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.
[17] Allan Wailoo,et al. The Impact of Moving from EQ-5D-3L to -5L in NICE Technology Appraisals , 2018, PharmacoEconomics.
[18] R. Cusick,et al. The Cost of Routine Follow-Up in Total Joint Arthroplasty and the Influence of These Visits on Treatment Plans , 2018, Kansas journal of medicine.
[19] A. Silman,et al. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on the risk of adverse events following joint replacement: a real-world cohort study , 2018, Clinical epidemiology.
[20] A. Liddle,et al. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement: a population-based study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales , 2018, BMJ Open.
[21] A. Leithner,et al. Trends and Economic Impact of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Central Europe: Findings from the Austrian National Database , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[22] J. Leal,et al. Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review protocol , 2018, BMJ Open.
[23] C. Jagger,et al. Use of primary care and other healthcare services between age 85 and 90 years: longitudinal analysis of a single-year birth cohort, the Newcastle 85+ study , 2018, BMJ Open.
[24] N. Broughton,et al. Follow-up after arthroplasty of the hip and knee : are we over-servicing or under-caring? , 2018, The bone & joint journal.
[25] S. Brownlee,et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world , 2017, The Lancet.
[26] G. Collins,et al. Lower limb arthroplasty: can we produce a tool to predict outcome and failure, and is it cost-effective? An epidemiological study , 2017 .
[27] Philip Kinghorn,et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions for the management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature , 2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
[28] Allan House,et al. Designing a privacy-preserving protocol to support transient and purpose-specific data linkages , 2017 .
[29] Sion Glyn-Jones,et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study , 2017, The Lancet.
[30] S. Kurtz,et al. Determining Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes Using the SF-6D Following Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2017, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.
[31] R. Trousdale,et al. A Novel Percentage-Based System for Determining Aseptic Loosening of Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Components. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[32] S. Hess,et al. The Community IntraVenous Antibiotic Study (CIVAS): a mixed-methods evaluation of patient preferences for and cost-effectiveness of different service models for delivering outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy , 2017 .
[33] C. Koutras,et al. Cost-Effective Mobile-Based Healthcare System for Managing Total Joint Arthroplasty Follow-Up , 2017, Healthcare informatics research.
[34] Lisa S. Hightower,et al. How often is the office visit needed? Predicting total knee arthroplasty revision risk using pain/function scores , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.
[35] J. Singh,et al. Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris Hip Score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty , 2016, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
[36] A. Carr,et al. Surrogate markers of long-term outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty , 2016, Bone & joint research.
[37] E. Roughead,et al. Risk factors for persistent and new chronic opioid use in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study , 2016, BMJ Open.
[38] M. Stone,et al. Is a questionnaire and radiograph-based follow-up model for patients with primary hip and knee arthroplasty a viable alternative to traditional regular outpatient follow-up clinic? , 2016, The bone & joint journal.
[39] Rachel Churchill,et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[40] J. Jauregui,et al. Determining Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes Using the SF-6D Preference-Based Measure in Patients Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[41] K. Bhaskaran,et al. Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.
[42] C. L. Barnes,et al. Avoiding readmissions-support systems required after discharge to continue rapid recovery? , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[43] C. Cooper,et al. Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[44] Lindsay K Smith,et al. A survey of the current state of hip arthroplasty surveillance in the United Kingdom. , 2014, Musculoskeletal care.
[45] G. Robert,et al. Disentangling rhetoric and reality: an international Delphi study of factors and processes that facilitate the successful implementation of decisions to decommission healthcare services , 2014, Implementation Science.
[46] W. Zimmerli,et al. Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant‐associated infection , 2014, Journal of internal medicine.
[47] A. Wengler,et al. Hip and knee replacement in Germany and the USA: analysis of individual inpatient data from German and US hospitals for the years 2005 to 2011. , 2014, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.
[48] T. Fehring,et al. Early failures in total hip arthroplasty -- a changing paradigm. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[49] Jonathan Karnon,et al. When to Use Discrete Event Simulation (DES) for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies? A Review and Critique of the Costs and Benefits of DES , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.
[50] N. Graves,et al. Control strategies to prevent total hip replacement-related infections: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison , 2014, BMJ Open.
[51] N. Arden,et al. A population-based survival analysis describing the association of body mass index on time to revision for total hip and knee replacements: results from the UK general practice research database , 2013, BMJ Open.
[52] C. Röder,et al. The course of radiographic loosening, pain and functional outcome around the first revision of a total hip arthroplasty , 2013, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
[53] Lindsay K Smith,et al. Empirical Support for Radiographic Review: A Follow-Up Study of Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2013, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.
[54] S. Mears,et al. Hip arthroplasty , 2012, The Lancet.
[55] Matthew L. Costa,et al. Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial , 2012, BMJ Open.
[56] J. Katz,et al. The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review of published literature. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.
[57] Jonathan Karnon,et al. Modeling Using Discrete Event Simulation , 2012 .
[58] Murray Krahn,et al. Conceptualizing a Model , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[59] R. Lawton,et al. Is long-term follow-up after uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty necessary? , 2012 .
[60] W. Maloney,et al. Is Routine Mid-term Total Hip Arthroplasty Surveillance Beneficial? , 2012, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
[61] C. Cooper,et al. The lifetime risk of total hip and knee arthroplasty: results from the UK general practice research database. , 2012, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[62] David J Beard,et al. Knee replacement , 2012, The Lancet.
[63] P. Dieppe,et al. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales , 2012, The Lancet.
[64] T. V. van Staa,et al. Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource , 2012, Therapeutic advances in drug safety.
[65] R. Fitzpatrick,et al. Rationing of total knee replacement: a cost-effectiveness analysis on a large trial data set , 2012, BMJ Open.
[66] C. Cooper,et al. Association between bisphosphonate use and implant survival after primary total arthroplasty of the knee or hip: population based retrospective cohort study , 2011 .
[67] M. Melloh,et al. Age at hip or knee joint replacement surgery predicts likelihood of revision surgery. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[68] J. Brazier,et al. Using health state utility values from the general population to approximate baselines in decision analytic models when condition-specific data are not available. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[69] P. Austin. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.
[70] R. Crawford,et al. Is there a need for routine follow‐up after primary total hip arthroplasty? , 2010, ANZ journal of surgery.
[71] K. Søballe,et al. The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty , 2010, Acta orthopaedica.
[72] T. Thillemann,et al. The risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty among statin users: a nationwide population-based nested case-control study. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[73] J. van der Meulen,et al. Identifying co‐morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score , 2010, The British journal of surgery.
[74] Samy Suissa,et al. Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[75] T. Thillemann. Use of medications and risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum.
[76] D. Moher,et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[77] M. Kenward,et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[78] R. Prescott,et al. Notes on the use and interpretation of radiostereometric analysis , 2009, Acta orthopaedica.
[79] S. Donell,et al. Community-based orthopaedic follow-up. Is it what doctors and patients want? , 2009, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.
[80] D. Macdonald,et al. (iii) New trends in total hip replacement: follow-up is it required and who pays? , 2008 .
[81] F. Haddad,et al. Should follow-up of patients with arthroplasties be carried out by general practitioners? , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[82] D W Murray,et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[83] David Moher,et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.
[84] W. Maloney,et al. Reasons for Revision Hip Surgery: A Retrospective Review , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[85] P. Dieppe,et al. Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[86] Olivier Ethgen,et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[87] T. Thornhill,et al. The fate of patients not returning for follow-up five years after total knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[88] Andrew Briggs,et al. The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment , 2004, Applied health economics and health policy.
[89] Sally C. York,et al. Long-term follow-up care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: results of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons' member survey. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[90] J Fisher,et al. Wear and deformation of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacements with joint laxity and swing phase microseparation , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.
[92] Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty , 2003, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[93] M. Brazzelli,et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. , 2002, Health technology assessment.
[94] W H Harris,et al. Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: the problem. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[95] C. Engh,et al. Wear-Through of a Modular Polyethylene Liner: Four Case Reports , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[96] J. Fisher,et al. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.
[97] J. Lonner,et al. Alternative surveillance after total knee arthroplasty: a viable option? , 1998, Orthopedics.
[98] A Briggs,et al. The Costs and Benefits of Primary Total Hip Replacement: How Likely Are New Prostheses To Be Cost-effective? , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[99] A. Carr,et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[100] P. Dolan,et al. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.
[101] J. Concato,et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[102] R. Brooks. EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.
[103] A. Carr,et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[104] J. E. Brazier,et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.
[105] William H. Harris,et al. Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement , 1990 .
[106] A. Kasuya. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.
[107] L. Dorr,et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[108] C. Goldsmith,et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.
[109] M. Wiege,et al. Correlation between Radiologic and Clinical Findings in Charnley Total Hip Replacement , 1987, Acta radiologica.
[110] C. Mackenzie,et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.
[111] W. Harris,et al. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.