Applying a Social Constructivist Approach to an Online Course on Ethics of Research

The growing trend of shifting from classroom to distance learning in ethics education programs raises the need to examine ways for adapting best instructional practices to online modes. To address this need, the current study was set to apply a social constructivist approach to an online course in research ethics and to examine its effect on the learning outcomes of science and engineering graduate students. The study applied a pre-test post-test quasi-experimental research design within a framework of a mixed-methods approach. The study compared the learning outcomes of students who participated in a social constructivist online course (N = 175) with those who studied in a conventional online course (N = 170). The data were collected via questionnaires and interviews. The findings indicated that both the conventional and the social constructivist online learners gained knowledge of facts and regulations. Yet, the social constructivist learners were more successful in demonstrating knowledge of practices that are used to establish research ethics, and in understanding the importance of conducting research in a responsible manner. The social constructivist online learners were also more successful in demonstrating awareness of ethical dilemmas, by identifying ethical dilemmas and providing solutions to ethical problems.

[1]  Rosa Lynn Pinkus,et al.  The Role of Professional Knowledge in Case-Based Reasoning in Practical Ethics , 2015, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[2]  Diana Bairaktarova,et al.  Engineering Student’s Ethical Awareness and Behavior: A New Motivational Model , 2016, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[3]  E. Michelle Todd,et al.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[4]  Miri Barak,et al.  Team diversity as a predictor of innovation in team projects of face-to-face and online learners , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[5]  C. Finelli,et al.  Two Years Later: A longitudinal look at the impact of engineering ethics education , 2013 .

[6]  L Alexandra Morrison,et al.  Situating Moral Agency: How Postphenomenology Can Benefit Engineering Ethics , 2019, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[7]  Logan L. Watts,et al.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences , 2017, Ethics & behavior.

[8]  Shane Connelly,et al.  Case-Based Knowledge and Ethics Education: Improving Learning and Transfer Through Emotionally Rich Cases , 2011, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[9]  M. Barak.  Science Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century: a Pedagogical Framework for Technology-Integrated Social Constructivism , 2016, Research in Science Education.

[10]  L. Ross,et al.  Research Ethics Education for Community-Engaged Research: A Review and Research Agenda , 2012, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[11]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics , 2016, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[12]  Miri Barak,et al.  AugmentedWorld: Facilitating the creation of location-based questions , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[13]  J. Lemke.  Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education , 2001 .

[14]  Bor Luen Tang,et al.  A Reflective Account of a Research Ethics Course for an Interdisciplinary Cohort of Graduate Students , 2020, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[15]  C. Gross.  Scientific Misconduct. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Trisha Phillips,et al.  America COMPETES at 5 years: An Analysis of Research-Intensive Universities’ RCR Training Plans , 2017, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[17]  Shane Connelly,et al.  Case-Based Ethics Instruction: The Influence of Contextual and Individual Factors in Case Content on Ethical Decision-Making , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[18]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences , 2009, Ethics & behavior.

[19]  Hossam Haick,et al.  Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Lauren E Abbott,et al.  Authorship Not Taught and Not Caught in Undergraduate Research Experiences at a Research University , 2020, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[21]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  Behnam Taebi,et al.  Teaching Engineering Ethics to PhD Students: A Berkeley–Delft Initiative , 2016, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[23]  Michael Giamellaro,et al.  Primary Contextualization of Science Learning through Immersion in Content-Rich Settings , 2014 .

[24]  Alison L. Antes,et al.  The lab management practices of “Research Exemplars” that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators , 2019, PloS one.

[25]  Miri Barak,et al.  Novice Researchers’ Views About Online Ethics Education and the Instructional Design Components that May Foster Ethical Practice , 2019, Science and Engineering Ethics.