Clinical utility of two-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in detecting coronary artery disease.

AIMS The accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography in detecting proximal coronary artery stenoses is unclear. We postulated that fast magnetic resonance angiography is capable of (1) imaging proximal coronary arteries, and (2) detecting stenoses of > or = 50% of their luminal diameter. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-five patients, referred for analysis of angina pectoris, underwent both conventional angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of coronary arteries. A fast k-space segmented gradient-echo technique was used during breath-holds. Two observers, blinded to the results of conventional angiography, independently analysed the magnetic resonance studies for (1) length of visualized segments, and (2) presence of signal voids indicative of stenoses. From 140 proximal arteries, 15 (11%) were excluded because of incomplete imaging or degraded image quality. Mean length of the visualized segments was 9 +/- 4 mm for the left main, 62 +/- 16 mm for the left anterior descending, 21 +/- 9 mm for the left circumflex and 89 +/- 32 mm for the right coronary artery. Sensitivity for detecting > or = 50% luminal diameter stenoses was 0.00 for the left circumflex, 0.53 for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 0.71 for the RCA and 1.00 for the left main artery. Specificity varied from 0.73 for the left anterior descending coronary artery to 0.96 for the left circumflex. Inter-observer agreement was 0.90. CONCLUSION Thus, segmented magnetic resonance angiography is capable of non-invasive imaging of proximal coronary anatomy. Its good accuracy in detecting left main coronary artery disease, intermediate accuracy in detecting right coronary artery and left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses, and low accuracy in detecting left circumflex lesions fit within a range of sensitivities and specificities found by others. Further technical advances are necessary to make the technique clinically robust.

[1]  R. Mccoll,et al.  Assessment of coronary arterial flow and flow reserve in humans with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Circulation.

[2]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Assessment of flow in the right human coronary artery by magnetic resonance phase contrast velocity measurement: Effects of cardiac and respiratory motion , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  C. Higgins,et al.  Coronary flow reserve: noninvasive measurement in humans with breath-hold velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[4]  C. Visser,et al.  Three-dimensional respiratory-gated magnetic resonance angiography of coronary arteries compared with conventional X-ray contrast angiography , 1996 .

[5]  J Keegan,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Heart.

[6]  M. McConnell,et al.  Identification of anomalous coronary arteries and their anatomic course by magnetic resonance coronary angiography. , 1995, Circulation.

[7]  J. Bronzwaer,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries. A new gold standard for delineating the proximal course? , 1995, Circulation.

[8]  G. Fürst,et al.  Factors Influencing Flow‐Induced Signal Loss in MR Angiography: An In Vitro Study , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  J Valk,et al.  Protocol for two-dimensional magnetic resonance coronary angiography studied in three-dimensional magnetic resonance data sets. , 1995, American heart journal.

[10]  W. Hundley,et al.  Measurement of absolute epicardial coronary artery flow and flow reserve with breath-hold cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Circulation.

[11]  R. Pettigrew,et al.  Turbulent Fluctuation Velocity: The Most Significant Determinant of Signal Loss in Stenotic Vessels , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  E M Haacke,et al.  MRI of Coronary Arteries: 2D Breath‐Hold vs 3D Respiratory‐Gated Acquisition , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  A. Duerinckx,et al.  Two-dimensional coronary MR angiography: analysis of initial clinical results. , 1994, Radiology.

[14]  Jennifer Keegan,et al.  The application of breath hold phase velocity mapping techniques to the measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity: Phantom data and initial in vivo results , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J Keegan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary arteries: technique and preliminary results. , 1993, British heart journal.

[16]  R R Edelman,et al.  Flow velocity quantification in human coronary arteries with fast, breath‐hold MR angiography , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo. , 1993, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  E M Haacke,et al.  Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with fat saturation and magnetization transfer contrast. , 1993, Radiology.

[19]  R. Edelman,et al.  A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Robert R. Edelman,et al.  Fat‐Suppressed Breath‐Hold Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography , 1993, Circulation.

[21]  Bob S. Hu,et al.  Fast Spiral Coronary Artery Imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  D B Plewes,et al.  Mechanisms of flow‐induced signal loss in MR angiography , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  R. Edelman,et al.  Coronary arteries: breath-hold MR angiography. , 1991, Radiology.

[24]  G Friedmann,et al.  MR imaging of poststenotic flow phenomena: Experimental studies , 1991, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[25]  Z H Cho,et al.  NMR angiography of coronary vessels with 2‐D planar image scanning , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  C L Dumoulin,et al.  A method of coronary MR angiography. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[27]  Bob S. Hu,et al.  Coronary angiography using fast selective inversion recovery , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  M Heller,et al.  Appearance of poststenotic jets in MRI: dependence on flow velocity and on imaging parameters. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  A. Pichard,et al.  Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications. , 1989, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[30]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Evaluation of flow through simulated vascular stenoses with gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[31]  D G Nishimura,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography by selective inversion recovery using a compact gradient echo sequence , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  E M Haacke,et al.  MR angiography of peripheral, carotid, and coronary arteries. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  MR imaging of the aortic root and proximal coronary arteries. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.