Network Models for Cognitive Development and Intelligence

Cronbach’s (1957) famous division of scientific psychology into two disciplines is still apparent for the fields of cognition (general mechanisms) and intelligence (dimensionality of individual differences). The welcome integration of the two fields requires the construction of mechanistic models of cognition and cognitive development that explain key phenomena in individual differences research. In this paper, we argue that network modeling is a promising approach to integrate the processes of cognitive development and (developing) intelligence into one unified theory. Network models are defined mathematically, describe mechanisms on the level of the individual, and are able to explain positive correlations among intelligence subtest scores—the empirical basis for the well-known g-factor—as well as more complex factorial structures. Links between network modeling, factor modeling, and item response theory allow for a common metric, encompassing both discrete and continuous characteristics, for cognitive development and intelligence.

[1]  K. Markon,et al.  A descriptivist approach to trait conceptualization and inference. , 2016, Psychological review.

[2]  Wm. R. Wright.  General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[3]  D. Borsboom,et al.  The concept of validity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[4]  R. Cattell.  Intelligence : its structure, growth and action , 1987 .

[5]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[6]  Verena D. Schmittmann,et al.  Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data , 2012 .

[7]  Verena D. Schmittmann,et al.  The Small World of Psychopathology , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[9]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Major Depression as a Complex Dynamic System , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Kan.  The nature of nurture: the role of gene-environment interplay in the development of intelligence , 2011 .

[11]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  Stagewise cognitive development: an application of catastrophe theory. , 1992, Psychological review.

[12]  R. Sternberg.  Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? , 1998 .

[13]  John Baer.  The Case for Domain Specificity of Creativity , 1998 .

[14]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[15]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Network Psychometrics. , 2016, 1609.02818.

[16]  Abe D. Hofman,et al.  The Balance-Scale Task Revisited: A Comparison of Statistical Models for Rule-Based and Information-Integration Theories of Proportional Reasoning , 2015, PLoS ONE.

[17]  K. Gutiérrez-Lobos,et al.  Do individual differences in test preparation compromise the measurement fairness of admission tests , 2016 .

[18]  Психология.  General Intelligence Factor , 2010 .

[19]  L. Cronbach.  The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[20]  R. Henson,et al.  A watershed model of individual differences in fluid intelligence , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  Sudden Transitions in Attitudes , 2003 .

[22]  Gilles E. Gignac.  Fluid intelligence shares closer to 60% of its variance with working memory capacity and is a better indicator of general intelligence , 2014 .

[23]  Mark Kac,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MECHANISMS OF PHASE TRANSITIONS. , 1969 .

[24]  Satoshi Kanazawa,et al.  General intelligence as a domain-specific adaptation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[25]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  On the Nature and Nurture of Intelligence and Specific Cognitive Abilities , 2013, Psychological science.

[26]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. , 2016, Psychological review.

[27]  Gunter Maris,et al.  Three representations of the Ising model , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Kristof Kovacs,et al.  Process Overlap Theory: A Unified Account of the General Factor of Intelligence , 2016 .

[29]  L. Natr,et al.  Murray, J.D.: Mathematical Biology. I. An Introduction.3rd Ed. , 2002, Photosynthetica.

[30]  Martin Niss,et al.  History of the Lenz-Ising Model 1920–1950: From Ferromagnetic to Cooperative Phenomena , 2005 .

[31]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Educating the Developing Mind: Towards an Overarching Paradigm , 2011 .

[32]  Gunter Maris,et al.  Bayesian inference for low-rank Ising networks , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[33]  D. Borsboom.  A network theory of mental disorders , 2017, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[34]  M. Meulders,et al.  A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimensions. , 2005, Psychological review.

[35]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[36]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models , 2016, Psychometrika.

[37]  Claudia D. van Borkulo,et al.  A new method for constructing networks from binary data , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[38]  D. Borsboom,et al.  A Network Approach to Psychopathology: New Insights into Clinical Longitudinal Data , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  S Epskamp,et al.  An Introduction to Network Psychometrics: Relating Ising Network Models to Item Response Theory Models , 2018, Multivariate behavioral research.

[40]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences. , 2011, Psychological review.

[42]  Michael I. Jordan.  Graphical Models , 1998 .

[43]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  Evidence for the Phase Transition from Rule I to Rule II on the Balance Scale Task , 2001 .

[44]  J. Flynn,et al.  Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. , 2012, The American psychologist.

[45]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Conceptions of Intelligence , 2001 .

[46]  R. Cattell.  Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. , 1963 .

[47]  N. Wermuth,et al.  Graphical Models for Associations between Variables, some of which are Qualitative and some Quantitative , 1989 .

[48]  J. Flynn,et al.  Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: the IQ paradox resolved. , 2001, Psychological review.

[49]  Jingchen Liu,et al.  A Fused Latent and Graphical Model for Multivariate Binary Data , 2016, 1606.08925.

[50]  K. Kan,et al.  Comment on “Residual group-level factor associations: Possibly negative implications for the mutualism theory of general intelligence” by Gilles E. Gignac (2016) , 2016 .

[51]  Marieke Wichers,et al.  Critical Slowing Down as a Personalized Early Warning Signal for Depression , 2016, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[52]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Endophenotypes in the genetic analyses of mental disorders. , 2006, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[53]  Lourens J. Waldorp,et al.  Structure estimation for mixed graphical models in high-dimensional data , 2015, 1510.05677.

[54]  S. Pinker.  How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics , 1994 .

[55]  J. Keats,et al.  Test theory. , 1967, Annual review of psychology.

[56]  M. Anderson,et al.  Annotation: conceptions of intelligence. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[57]  M. Iona.  What is g , 1987 .

[58]  Godfrey H. Thomson,et al.  The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability. , 1940 .

[59]  Abe D. Hofman,et al.  Dynamics of development: a complex systems approach , 2014 .

[60]  Rina Foygel,et al.  Extended Bayesian Information Criteria for Gaussian Graphical Models , 2010, NIPS.

[61]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Why g is not an adaptation: a comment on Kanazawa (2004). , 2006, Psychological review.

[62]  E. Ising.  Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus , 1925 .

[63]  C. B.,et al.  The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability , 1939, Nature.

[64]  H. Eysenck.  Thomson's 'bonds' or Spearman's 'energy': sixty years on , 1987 .

[65]  Gilles E. Gignac.  Residual group-level factor associations: Possibly negative implications for the mutualism theory of general intelligence , 2016 .

[66]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[67]  James D. Murray.  Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[68]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[69]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. , 2006, Psychological review.

[70]  E. Markman,et al.  When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth , 1994 .

[71]  David J. Bartholomew,et al.  Measuring Intelligence: Facts and Fallacies , 2004 .

[72]  Martin Lawn,et al.  A new lease of life for Thomson's bonds model of intelligence. , 2009, Psychological review.

[73]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  James A. Weston,et al.  Principles of Development and Differentiation , 1966 .