An Architectural Design for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation in Cyber-Physical Systems

Several use cases from the areas of manufacturing and process industry, require highly accurate sensor data. As sensors always have some degree of uncertainty, methods are needed to increase their reliability. The common approach is to regularly calibrate the devices to enable traceability according to national standards and Systeme international (SI) units - which follows costly processes. However, sensor networks can also be represented as Cyber Physical Systems (CPS) and a single sensor can have a digital representation (Digital Twin) to use its data further on. To propagate uncertainty in a reliable way in the network, we present a system architecture to communicate measurement uncertainties in sensor networks utilizing the concept of Asset Administration Shells alongside methods from the domain of Organic Computing. The presented approach contains methods for uncertainty propagation as well as concepts from the Machine Learning domain that combine the need for an accurate uncertainty estimation. The mathematical description of the metrological uncertainty of fused or propagated values can be seen as a first step towards the development of a harmonized approach for uncertainty in distributed CPSs in the context of Industrie 4.0. In this paper, we present basic use cases, conceptual ideas and an agenda of how to proceed further on.

[1]  Karthick Thiyagarajan,et al.  Data-driven machine learning approach for predicting volumetric moisture content of concrete using resistance sensor measurements , 2016, 2016 IEEE 11th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA).

[2]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  A scalable synchronization protocol for large scale sensor networks and its applications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Klaus Dietmayer,et al.  Temporal synchronization in multi-sensor fusion for future driver assistance systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication.

[4]  Prem Prakash Jayaraman,et al.  Internet of Things and Edge Cloud Computing Roadmap for Manufacturing , 2016, IEEE Cloud Computing.

[5]  Metin Tekkalmaz,et al.  Communication Solutions for the Integration of Distributed Control in Logistics Systems , 2019, IECON 2019 - 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[6]  Fei Tao,et al.  A Smart Manufacturing Service System Based on Edge Computing, Fog Computing, and Cloud Computing , 2019, IEEE Access.

[7]  Alexander Willner,et al.  Towards Programmable Fog Nodes in Smart Factories , 2016, 2016 IEEE 1st International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W).

[8]  Eckart UHLMANN,et al.  Smart wireless sensor network and configuration of algorithms for condition monitoring applications , 2017 .

[9]  Christian Diedrich,et al.  Synchronization of Industrial Plant and Digital Twin , 2019, 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[10]  Joseph Walsh,et al.  Adaptive process control and sensor fusion for process analytical technology , 2016, 2016 27th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC).

[11]  Yan Lu,et al.  The Paradigm Shift in Smart Manufacturing System Architecture , 2016, APMS.

[12]  Claudio Geisert,et al.  Decentralized Data Analytics for Maintenance in Industrie 4.0 , 2017 .

[13]  Jörg Hähner,et al.  Organic Traffic Control , 2011, Organic Computing.

[14]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Precise timestamping and temporal synchronization in multi-sensor fusion , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[15]  Dag Sjong,et al.  Requirements, drivers and analysis of wireless sensor network solutions for the Oil & Gas industry , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (EFTA 2007).

[16]  Lei Li,et al.  Anshan: Wireless Sensor Networks for Equipment Fault Diagnosis in the Process Industry , 2008, 2008 5th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[17]  C. Vázquez,et al.  Multi-sensor system using plastic optical fibers for intrinsically safe level measurements , 2004 .

[18]  Claudio Geisert,et al.  Cluster identification of sensor data for predictive maintenance in a Selective Laser Melting machine tool , 2018 .

[19]  Manfred Broy,et al.  Anforderungen an CPS aus Sicht der Automatisierungstechnik , 2013, Autom..

[20]  K. Dietmayer,et al.  DATA SYNCHRONIZATION STRATEGIES FOR MULTI-SENSOR FUSION , 2003 .

[21]  Edward A. Lee Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).

[22]  Fei Tao,et al.  Modeling of Cyber-Physical Systems and Digital Twin Based on Edge Computing, Fog Computing and Cloud Computing Towards Smart Manufacturing , 2018, Volume 1: Additive Manufacturing; Bio and Sustainable Manufacturing.

[23]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Toward open manufacturing: A cross-enterprises knowledge and services exchange framework based on blockchain and edge computing , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[24]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[25]  Kevin I-Kai Wang,et al.  Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues , 2020, Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf..